Don’t CW this.
-
Chuck Darwinreplied to Chris Alemany🇺🇦🇨🇦🇪🇸 last edited by
@chris @akurjata @davidakin @pennydaflos
I confirmed this as well...
#Instagram is giving "content warning" for #democrat
But shows pages of hits for #republican -
@chris I am in Tucson AZ. I had the same results. I am floored. And sharing.
-
@RtotheKelly it’s insane right!?
-
Gurre Vildskäggreplied to Chris Alemany🇺🇦🇨🇦🇪🇸 last edited by
@chris
Can confirm same in Sweden. -
Petrichor ᚄᚔᚅᚐᚁᚆᚃᚒᚔᚂreplied to Chris Alemany🇺🇦🇨🇦🇪🇸 last edited by
@chris What's CW?
-
Wondering how the Zionists are feeling now, as they see their protectors emerge as fully fledged Nazis?
Maybe it will all be OK for them as Zionism is not compatible with Judaism in reality.
-
Martin Vermeer FCDreplied to Petrichor ᚄᚔᚅᚐᚁᚆᚃᚒᚔᚂ last edited by
@sinabhfuil @chris Content warning. Recommended to use for sensitive subjects. Recommended to *not* use for witnessing evil that must be exposed.
-
@chris
As like as what democrats did to Trump when he wasn't president.KARMA!
-
@chris New Zealand here, same thing. First it showed the same message, now the tag looks entirely scrubbed. Just “No results.”
-
@chris #biden, #kamalaharris are not working either... This is really scary. I am not ready for the 1933 vibes that are coming from the US... Especially not given the technology that we have these days.
-
@chris
crazy if real :{ -
kay@foodnpoliticsreplied to Chris Alemany🇺🇦🇨🇦🇪🇸 last edited by
@chris
At first, I didn’t use the hashtag and both party names generated normal results.It was only when I put a hashtag before democrat(s) that I got the sensitive content result (for #Democrat #DemocraticParty and #VoteBlue but not #Democrats ).
The Learn More link lists content that they would deem “upsetting or sensitive”, so I tried some issue tags.
All of these work:
#ClimateChange
#ReproductiveHealth
#LGBTQI
#TransRights
#Democracy
#Genocide
#GazaOne that did not work:
#Abortion -
@chris Can verify that # democrat, singular, is giving the same result in Spain, whereas in the plural, it's normal.
-
kay@foodnpoliticsreplied to kay@foodnpolitics last edited by
@chris
I wondered if there was a new setting change with this Sensitive Content Control thing. So I searched how to adjust it: https://help.instagram.com/251027992727268The middle option of “See some sensitive content” was selected. I selected “See more sensitive content.”
Still hidden results but now even #Democrats doesn’t work. So much for that.
Looks like clear ratfuckery at work.
-
-
@JimmyB @MatWright @chris Israeli here. Most people don't know of this yet. Wait four hours till the 17 o'clock news. It's likely social media won't propagate posts about this due to obvious reasons.
There'll be two answers. One, "Elon isn't Trump". Two, rage.
And "Zionism is incompatible with Judaism"? Dude, please read some literature. Kahanism, "messiah mode" (book and video), Israeli definitions of Zionism (hint: there are at least 20, Zionism is just a general "good word": everyone tries to claim they are the patriots, not those other, evil monsters)
-
"Dude, please read some literature"
Thanks 'dude'. I've read quite a bit.
But yes - there are forms of Zionism - not all of which involve massacring Palestinians. However, as understood and propagated in our media and by the Israeli Gov and her supporters, there is one form. And that currently-dominant form does involve massacring Palestinians. A lot of Israeli writing since the Nakba - including liberal authors - have maintained that Zionist dehumanisation.
-
Great then.
The ideology of the current Israeli government is Kahanism. Speaking of "Zionism" is incredibly unspecific, and encompasses almost the entirety of Israel's political compass: it's used the same way as patriotism. And therefore, you can't really say it's "incompatible with Judaism". It's like I'd go around saying how American patriotism ruins the world. Let's not.
And: Kahanism, which I assume is what you meant, is indeed contradictory to everything Judaism is about. But there are lots of ideologies that call themselves Zionism as well, and aren't.
The only interests calling Kahanism Zionism serves is Kahanists': that way, they can oppress their opposition by calling them "anti Zionist"—think "anti patriotic", the implication is clear: "traitor".
-
Well - I'm not Jewish, but Jewish mates talk about Zionism in this way.
And I was inspired to learn more listening, some years ago, to a member of the Biritish Board of Jewish Deputies on the BBC Today programme who said that you cannot be a Jew and not be a Zionist. And he explained what it meant. It meant what I mean when I use the word Zionist.
So - take youer point. But no one knows what Kahanism is. But we all know what 'Zionism' is - as used.
-
And I was inspired to learn more listening, some years ago, to a member of the Biritish Board of Jewish Deputies on the BBC Today programme who said that you cannot be a Jew and not be a Zionist. And he explained what it meant. It meant what I mean when I use the word Zionist.
They were either Kahanist or Bibistic themselves. Plus, I wouldn't call the BBC a reliable source on Israel Palestine: they can't seem to decide whose side's war crimes they want to lie about.
But no one knows what Kahanism is
People Google it, or ask, or just assume your intention from context (as it's incredibly clear; you don't necessarily need to know the history of the term, though should). That's the word I use, always. And if they don't know: introduce it. It's important to know what terms the other side wants you to use (Zionism) to refer to them, and why.
-
Laxystemreplied to Laxystem last edited by [email protected]
@JimmyB @MatWright @chris The fediverse doesn't only consist of the English-speaking world; There are lots of other cultures here, and this meaning of Zionism is pretty unique to Kahanists and American media consumers (which is everyone, yes, but native English speakers especially).