As Ruth Ben-Ghiat says, the wall-to-wall lying we're seeing Trump engage in right now as the election nears is par for the course for authoritarians, who have to control reality for their followers. She says that "Trump’s campaign … is better understoo...

Andrew

It’s always the same question “where will the money come from?”

Strange it’s a question never asked when cutting taxes….

Jeff Byrnes

@wdlindsy @inthehands @rbreich I kinda think this is the logical end state of white men getting a pass for all kinds of shit while BIPOC and women (esp. BIPOC women) are held to nearly-impossible & contradictory standards.

William Lindsey :toad:

Keith Owens puts the point clearly and succinctly:

"Your vote for Kamala Harris and Tim Walz isn’t just a vote for competence, sanity, and accountability. It is a vote for reality. Because, in reality, there is no such thing as alternative facts. Only truth and lies. And in reality, some lies can kill you."

#Trump #JDVance #KamalaHarris #TimWalz
/14

Trump response to hurricanes shows reality is at risk in November

Issue #745 The Choice, Thursday, October 10, 2024

(wearespeaking.substack.com)

William Lindsey :toad:

Todd Beeton cites Stuart Stevens' response to the two New York Times headlines about Trump and Harris that Josh Marshall highlighted yesterday (see /10 in this thread for that graphic). Stevens says,

"These two headlines should be studied in journalism classes for decades.

Trump headline could apply to a Nobel prize winner in genetic studies."

#Trump #KamalaHarris #media #NewYorkTimes #BothSidesism #FalseEquivalence
/15

The Media Is Finally Calling Trump Out. But Is It Too Late?

The double standard Kamala Harris is being held to by the media is mind numbing

(thinkbigpicture.substack.com)

William Lindsey :toad:

"They have already dangerously normalized a criminal con man grifter, making him just a coin flip away from the White House.

If Trump regains office, a substantial part of the blame will rest with our media, just as it did in 2016. How they sleep at night knowing this is beyond comprehension."

#Trump #KamalaHarris #media #NewYorkTimes #BothSidesism #FalseEquivalence #normalization
/16

William Lindsey :toad:

@jeffbyrnes @inthehands @rbreich I very much agree.

William Lindsey :toad:

@serendip1959 Never — it's asked only of Democrats and never of Republicans.

RonSupportsYou

@wdlindsy We agree on many things concerning the upcoming election. One suggestion: when you include a quote, mention (at the same time) who actually said those words. I was going to boost what you wrote, but not knowing who said it kept me from doing so.

William Lindsey :toad:

@martinvermeer You'll have to help me see where the word "criticized" figures into the excerpts above. I'm not seeing it.

William Lindsey :toad:

@eberhofer You're exactly right — they're now an active pert of it.

William Lindsey :toad:

@philip_cardella Yes, I agree: it's a choice, and the question is why. I've just read Todd Beeton's take on that matter. With NYT, he seems to think the overweening factor is Sulzberger's pique at Biden's snubbing him. I'm more inclined to look at the economic interests of the owners and top management of media.

The Media Is Finally Calling Trump Out. But Is It Too Late?

The double standard Kamala Harris is being held to by the media is mind numbing

(thinkbigpicture.substack.com)

William Lindsey :toad:

@Greengordon You're very right. That's an important point to make here: they dump the costs on all of us.

Eric Lawton

@wdlindsy

Much of "the media" is directed by billionaire owners.

They sleep on comfortable piles of cash.

William Lindsey :toad:

@DJHDJH Thanks for your explanation, and I apologize that I did not see your point. I agree with you.

Bob Blaskiewicz of Plenty

@wdlindsy They sleep on cushy piles of ad money, I think.

William Lindsey :toad:

@EricLawton That's my take on what's going on, too.

William Lindsey :toad:

@rjblaskiewicz Yes, I think that's a huge factor.

William Lindsey :toad:

@RonSupportsYou I'm not sure which quote in particular you mean. The method I use is to link quotes, with the first instance always identifying whom I'm quoting. When I follow that instance with another excerpt in quotation marks, it means the person named in the previous posting(s) is the person speaking. So if you mean that /16 does not name the speaker, to find the name, you move back to /15 and you'll see that it's Todd Beeton. I hope this is clear, and sorry for the confusion.

RonSupportsYou

@wdlindsy You wrote these words that I agree with: "They have already dangerously normalized a criminal con man grifter, ..." Yes, it was /16. Most people will not read 16 posts to discover who said those words. I prefer to name names in each of my posts that included a quote.

William Lindsey :toad:

@RonSupportsYou I thought that might be the posting to which you were referring. It was Todd Beeton who wrote those words, not I. I always signify that I'm quoting someone by placing her/his statements in quotation marks. When an excerpt does not have an author's name, that means that the person speaking is the person named in the posting(s) immediately prior to the one with no author named. Because character space is very limited, I use that shorthand method and find most followers understand.