Another bad derivative of my art:- Reusing my Creative Commons artwork without attribution- Putting it on top of AI genI wonder how they managed to sell 568 of them...
-
Another bad derivative of my art:
- Reusing my Creative Commons artwork without attribution
- Putting it on top of AI gen
I wonder how they managed to sell 568 of them...
Revolting.
Well, I filled in a report to ask them to at least give credit.link: https://share.temu.com/00LkQzG68XA
my art: https://www.peppercarrot.com/en/viewer/artworks__2018-11-19_thank-you-patreon-day_by-David-Revoy.html -
@davidrevoy There are makers and there are takers. We’ve built a system that rewards the takers
-
@aral True.
It's also the first time I see this industry using AI-gen for the photo model and stealing real art on top. Disturbing.
Maybe they are starting to realise that their AI art is hard to sell. -
Quick update: Temu wrote me this morning that they have removed the product:
> "[...] After receiving your infringement notice, we quickly reviewed the submitted materials and removed the infringing content [...] TEMU's stance on infringement aligns with the rights of intellectual property owners because infringement not only harms our shared consumers' interests but also tarnishes TEMU's reputation"
Not what I asked for (I wanted the :cc: :ccby: Attribution), but it's still a win.
