"So are you going to just create another relay/appview or are you going to try to lead Bluesky/ATProto towards being more decentralized"

[cwebber@social.coop]

"So are you going to just create another relay/appview or are you going to try to lead Bluesky/ATProto towards being more decentralized"

"What are you talking about, adding a second relay/appview *is* making Bluesky/ATProto more decentralized"

[cwebber@social.coop]

I am so tired

[mayintoronto@beige.party]

@cwebber Here's what I'm hoping for:
- They raise money.
- Realize what they initially planned on doing is unfeasible / not good enough
- Spend a part of that money making it very public that Bluesky is not decentralized
- Spend the rest of that money building interoperability tools.

Alternatively,
- build out the second relay/appview,
- then (somehow, technomagically) drastically reduce the barrier to entry of setting up a 3rd, 4th, 5th, etc etc.

[cwebber@social.coop]

@mayintoronto I think projects which raise a lot of money but don't have a clear or valuable direction at the beginning end up, on average, blowing through that money without doing as much as they can/should

[alfredon996@livellosegreto.it]

@cwebber I have a question, let's say I create another full network relay, will normal Bsky clients post to my relay as well? Or users have change some configuration ?

[cwebber@social.coop]

@alfredon996 they won't post to it automatically