and another thing: im not mad.
-
Esther Payne :bisexual_flag:replied to Jason Lefkowitz last edited by
@jalefkowit @grrrr_shark sometimes you can even swap roles.
Like sometimes I'm the person being asked to not post
. -
Grrrr, Darth Moose Sharkreplied to Esther Payne :bisexual_flag: last edited by
@onepict @jalefkowit Excellent - this is how communities are *supposed* to work
ïž -
@jalefkowit @onepict of there is one thing I have noticed over the last four years, itâs that the investors value displays of dominance more than money
âIf your company doesnât squeeze the customers dry, another customer will. So if you donât make with the squeezing we will find someone else who willâ
On the card heâs getting scored on, heâs doing a bang up job
-
@jalefkowit a minor quibble. There is a modern narrative that Cnut the Great is misunderstood, and was making a point about hubris.
"Let all men know how empty and worthless is the power of kings, for there is none worthy of the name, but He whom heaven, earth, and sea obey by eternal laws."
-
Jason Lefkowitzreplied to Will Deakin last edited by [email protected]
@wnd I know. It's just a common metaphor.
-
@jalefkowit All that makes sense and I agree, but how do you publish a correction (as per the last point) without drawing more attention to the story or making it seem youâre agreeing with everything else?
-
@vitor You just publish the correction by itself. This will unavoidably draw attention to the story, so you donât bother unless youâre correcting a truly serious error. Youâre not in a debate with the publication, thereâs no judge who will give you points for challenging trivial mistakes or areas of ambiguity. Arguing about those things will just make you look petty, so you donât.
-
@vitor Leaving other things uncorrected doesnât mean you endorse them. But you donât have to go on record about every single thing in the world you disagree with.
If youâre really concerned, you can start the correction like âWhile we dispute many of the allegations made in the article, we particularly object to [ specific allegation ] because it is based on serious errors of fact.â Then you correct the facts â not the allegation, but the facts that underlie it.
-
Tim Ward âđȘđșđ¶ #FBPEreplied to Jason Lefkowitz last edited by
@jalefkowit "If you respond to their agenda then they've won - it doesn't matter what you say or who was right."
-
Jason Lefkowitzreplied to Tim Ward âđȘđșđ¶ #FBPE last edited by [email protected]
@TimWardCam Or as the old saying puts it, never argue with a person who buys ink by the barrel
