This post reminds me that software engineering doesn't have a plus minus.

Kee Hinckley

@mekkaokereke My entire career has been centered around being the person people came to to figure out how something worked. If it's not in my wheelhouse, I'll find the person who knows it. That's how I met my first wife, she'd just started at our company and when she had questions, even about her own side of the org (she was in compilers, I was in UI), her coworkers would say, "Ask Kee, he's right across from your office. He'll know."

When I joined Meta's Integrity team (aka trust and safety elsewhere), I made it clear to the person who hired me that my leadership style was to understand the system and be a facilitator who found the people with good ideas and helped them be successful. Unfortunately, when I started, the org had changed. When I told me new boss that my leadership style was to facilitate success for others, he said "We'll have to do something about that".

It was a disaster. Some of that was other issues I was having, but it was very clear that in a company that prides (?) itself on rewarding people based only on measurable progress, someone who helps other people succeed was not going to be valued.

It even extended to entire groups. I pointed out that the team that built the tools for new groups to integrate content moderation was swamped supporting new teams rather than writing software. "Why," I asked, "Don't we create a team whose sole job is onboarding other groups?"

The answer was, "We tried that, but we can't keep the team staffed unless we just use contractors, because there's no way to get promoted in a team like that."

If Meta can't put a dollar value on something, they don't think it's important.

Rowland Mosbergen

@paul_ipv6 @mekkaokereke in my terminology, I call them translators or generalists.

They not only know how to talk to people to get things done, but also can push back because they have enough knowledge to know when others have already done it/ know that it is possible.

GunChleoc

@admin @mekkaokereke @david_megginson I definitely document the shit out of everything, because I'm a bus factor of 1.

Documenting things can be hard for software developers though, because not all of them speak neurotypical. So, generalist "translators" are indeed important.

David Megginson

@gunchleoc Yes to all that. Present Me appreciates every word of documentation Past Me wrote 5, 10, or 25 years ago, because otherwise I wouldn't know what that fool was thinking with that code.

But as you wrote, writing doesn't come easy to everyone. And furthermore, documentation works only if you guess correctly in advance what questions people will ask. Experienced human colleagues can adapt to changing contexts and answer new questions as they emerge.

@admin @mekkaokereke

David Megginson

@gunchleoc The other side of the coin is that BigTech companies think employees are interchangeable units that they can lay off at year-end and replace 3 months later with a different "full stack developer with 10 years experience."

Not so. Companies are the unique people who make them up, with their knowledge, experience, and social interactions. Connector types hold them together: casually laying one off is like amputating a finger and assuming you can replace it later

@admin @mekkaokereke

GunChleoc

@david_megginson @admin @mekkaokereke Yep. Some poor sod will need to understand that code 2 years down the road, and chances are that poor sod will be yourself.

If you aren't given time to do anything else, at the very least hack some quick comments into the code for the important decisions you made.

Riley S. Faelan

@mekkaokereke The fact that highly sklled yet marginalised people tend to get career-blocked and end up in these "informal advisory" rôles might possibly have contributed to the Hollywood trope of the Magical Black Person and/or Old Woman Who Gives Good Advice.

Riley S. Faelan

@admin You're being a bad manager.

Carry on. Wouldn't want to give you good advice that might increase your power of bad management over non-standard people who deserve better.

@mekkaokereke

mekka okereke :verified:

@riley

Yup.

Somewhat related...

Stacey Abrams is not an impressive civil rights worker. ‍️ Well she is, but that's not what's really going on.

MLK jr was not an impressive civil rights worker either. ‍️ Again, that's not what's really happening.

Stacey is an under-leveled governor of Georgia. MLK jr was an under-leveled president of the United States of America.

mekka okereke :verified: (@[email protected])

Attached: 2 images @[email protected] Stacey Abrams. https://www.fairfight.com Stacey Abrams isn't "a brilliant civil rights leader." She's a brilliant governor, who was denied being a governor due to systemic racism, and so has been forced to spend her time addressing that racism before she can be a governor. So yeah, she's a little overqualified to drive this non-profit. Once you see it, you can't unsee it. Civil rights leader is the fallback job title for Black people that should have been governors or presidents.

Hachyderm.io (hachyderm.io)

Riley S. Faelan

@mekkaokereke That's a neat and sobering way to put it.

Rachel Rawlings

@riley @mekkaokereke I still remember the 50-somehting woman at the travel agency I went to work for at 20, talking about how she trained her division head from an intern while she had the same job for over 15 years.

GunChleoc

@riley @mekkaokereke This reminds me of an article that was posted here somewhere this week on another thread: https://www.noidea.dog/glue

Simeon.__proto__

@rowlandm @paul_ipv6 @mekkaokereke I feel like I'm in this bucket and I've tended to describe myself as the grease that keeps the machine running smoothly