NodeBB and Threads
-
@[email protected] correct, and while NodeBB has one for publicly available content
/api/recent, it doesn't have one for ActivityPub content... but that can be amended.However I can't fault Threads for this too much considering that it's not really their job to research every implementor and find their public feeds. I simply am surprised by the short-sightedness of assuming that
hasMastondonApi == AP server. Most other software would've looked at the problem, realized that the fediverse doesn't consist solely of Mastodon, and approached the problem from a different angle.... but then again maybe I'm wrong
-
Григорий Клюшниковreplied to julian last edited by
Will this comment federate?
-
@julian I think that they are prioritizing big players. Mastodon is an obvious priority. They are working with Bridgy Fed to connect with Bluesky. I am sure at some point they will have to support WordPress' ActivityPub implementation. Smaller players won't get as much attention, at least for now.
-
-
@Scott M. Stolz Like a diaspora* dev once said: Threads didn't "implement ActivityPub", they "implemented Mastodon".
-
It indeed does to Lemmy.
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by [email protected]
Will this comment federate?
It indeed does to Lemmy.
although NodeBB users don't see context unless you quote them
-
@[email protected] it's something I've been thinking about addressing as well.
Theoretically one could display a quote above the post, but I wouldn't want it to be confused with a quote post, which is a different beast (and one not present in forums) altogether.
