Relaxing treatment of non-notes by Mastodon
-
@[email protected] @[email protected] yeah,
as:Listen(object)or some such.I'd have to refactor a bit since my code pretty much expects either Announce or Create, but it's for the better anyway.
-
@lkanies @thisismissem @julian @hongminhee @pfefferle and I think this reasoning has been explained to you in some detail by several people. Hopefully you can see that
-
@johnonolan @thisismissem @julian @hongminhee @pfefferle definitely a situation where neither of us is convincing the other
️. But I’m just some guy with opinions on the internet (and experience in other OSS projects). My opinions deserve no weight here, so I will slink away -
@jenniferplusplus @samsethi @julian Pleroma uses
Listenactivities to display "currently listening" status: https://docs-develop.pleroma.social/backend/development/API/pleroma_api/#get-apiv1pleromaaccountsidscrobbles
I think this activity can also be used for counting podcast listeners. -
@[email protected] Very cool, thank you!
Hopefully @[email protected] will reconsider and perhaps federate out
as:Listenin addition -
@julian @silverpill we will we have two more changes ot make to our AP client tomorrow. We just enabled any AP user/client to follow any podcast and get their new episode, play, comment etc actvitiy. But next week we will publish with the listen verb for clips and see what happens ... thank you
-
@julian // There is no target="_top", only target="_blank". Well, you can use _top, but it is just a normal name and any new link opened will replace a page previously opened, which will likely be not what a user wanted.
-
Just coming across this now, hello everyone -- I wanted to say that Hometown has implemented what @julian proposes in the OP for its entire existence, since about 2019. It's worked quite well!
https://github.com/hometown-fork/hometown/wiki/More-content-types
-
@dariusk @[email protected] Thanks for sharing this, I think it's fantastic that this is already adopted in a Mastodon fork.
May I ask whether there have been attempts in the past to get these changes back upstream to Mastodon?
-
@julian This was ~4 years ago but I asked someone on the team (I forget who) if it would be a welcome PR and I was told that it probably wouldn't be, so I didn't make the PR.
Of course that was a long time ago! Also of note, this was completely and totally a hack and I don't think my actual implementation is what I would want to put upstream at this point. What's more interesting is that it hasn't been the cause of any UI concerns; basically what you postulate above, that the "hide long content behind a cut" functionality pretty much solves the problem, is true.
-
