if your programming language has “private property” -and “class heirarchy” then it’s built by capitalists in aid of capitalism.
-
if your programming language has “private property” -and “class heirarchy” then it’s built by capitalists in aid of capitalism.
-
Luci for dyeingreplied to Luci for dyeing last edited by
In Communist programming language, there is no greater or lesser.
all values are equal
-
Luci for dyeingreplied to Luci for dyeing last edited by
in Communist programming language we have shared everything concurrency
-
Luci for dyeingreplied to Luci for dyeing last edited by
in communist programming, no class heirarchy. there is only loyalty to the party
-
Laxystem (Masto/Glitch)replied to Luci for dyeing last edited by [email protected]
@zens so, Kotlin is communist?
(Yes, Kotlin has classes. But if you use them, you're doing something wrong. If it can be an interface, it should be an interface)
-
Luci for dyeingreplied to Luci for dyeing last edited by
in communist programming, we do not escape special characters. we escape to the one place that has not been corrupted by capitalism: space!
-
Luci for dyeingreplied to Luci for dyeing last edited by
in communist programming the flow of control is not top down. we share control. no singular “if” statements, a committee must decide
-
Luci for dyeingreplied to Luci for dyeing last edited by
in communist programming all operations are stateful. in many respects, it is not at all functional
-
@zens in communist programming an object can be a hunter in the morning, fisher in the afternoon, rearer of cattle in the afternoon, and a critic in the evening,
-
mx alex tax1a - 2020 (4)replied to Luci for dyeing last edited by
@zens we have been not-quite-saying this for a while