> However, I disagree with some of the analysis, and have a couple specific points to correct.
-
Christine Lemmer-Webberreplied to Christine Lemmer-Webber last edited by
And that means we can't pretend that decentralization is something that's some future possibility or goal, that it's gonna happen some day we promise.
I'd love to be proven wrong on everything I laid out.
Though I think the only way to do that without being worse than AP is serious rearchitecting.
-
Christine Lemmer-Webberreplied to Christine Lemmer-Webber last edited by
Who's empowered and who has agency and how we can increase the agency of everyone is indeed, all I care about. It's what "decentralization" means to me and matters to me as a goal. You can't drop the power dynamics. It *is* about the power dynamics.
I want us to build a better future. A real one.
-
Christine Lemmer-Webberreplied to Christine Lemmer-Webber last edited by
One thing I am confident about: it's not that Bluesky's engineering team doesn't care.
Actually I only really know two of Bluesky's main people well, Jay Graber and Bryan Newbold.
I know they do both care.
But so did Twitter's early devs. Twitter was supposed to be decentralized too.
-
Christine Lemmer-Webberreplied to Christine Lemmer-Webber last edited by
It's easy to forget that Blaine Cook led a team at Twitter in early days to make Twitter decentralized and the team there was worried about the effects centralization can have.
Investors killed it anyway.
It has to be more than about caring, the work has to happen and be preserved.
-
Christine Lemmer-Webberreplied to Christine Lemmer-Webber last edited by
I've said enough. I've said more than enough. I've said more than people probably thought could possibly happen on the subject on a blogpost or social media thread let alone *two*.
And that's with me dropping part of the second blogpost because I fell and hurt my hand.
It's time to wrap up.
-
Christine Lemmer-Webberreplied to Christine Lemmer-Webber last edited by
I hope I haven't caused emotional strain on anyone. I spent a while walking back from brunch and was pretty depressed and was talking with my girlfriend: was I just *mean* about this whole thing?
She reassured me she didn't think I was, but I still feel like I was mean.
I tried not to be.
-
Raccoon at TechHub :mastodon:replied to Christine Lemmer-Webber last edited by [email protected]
@cwebber
Yeah you've said so much that I don't think I will ever be able to get through the entire thread. :VI did like some of the points that I saw when I skimmed through it though. :3
-
Christine Lemmer-Webberreplied to Christine Lemmer-Webber last edited by
But despite there being literally millions of people on both Bluesky and the fediverse, I haven't seen any other analysis that went comprehensively into architecture, terminology, and their implications at the level I did in terms of their *implications* and *impact*.
I think it needed to be done.
-
Raccoon at TechHub :mastodon:replied to Christine Lemmer-Webber last edited by
@cwebber @3psboyd
Something I think is really important for people to understand about those programming problems before they post comics like this is that, even though they don't accurately mimic the day-to-day of professional programming work, they do teach a lot of skills in terms of solving the unique problems that people encounter, and tell potential employers that the person who solves them knows enough to solve a programming problem.Keep in mind that the vast majority of applicants for programming jobs, including a large chunk of people with degrees in computer science, do not know how to do any programming in any language. Solving weird programming problems at least shows a degree of general competency.
-
Raccoon at TechHub :mastodon:replied to Christine Lemmer-Webber last edited by [email protected]
-
Christine Lemmer-Webberreplied to Christine Lemmer-Webber last edited by
So one more post after this one. Just one more post.
I have said so much, I feel like I am pumping the brakes on train of analysis and it's taking a while to come to a halt but it's time. I want to wrap it up, for everyone reading this, for myself.
So here we go.
-
Christine Lemmer-Webberreplied to Christine Lemmer-Webber last edited by
We should build decentralized systems because we care about empowering people. We can't forget about power distribution.
Let's be clear about what our systems can and can't do.
And no matter where you are, if you're trying to build a healthier internet for everyone, keep it up.
Thanks.
-
Matt Boydreplied to Raccoon at TechHub :mastodon: last edited by
-
Raccoon at TechHub :mastodon:replied to Matt Boyd last edited by
-
Josef Davies-Coatesreplied to Christine Lemmer-Webber last edited by
@cwebber I'd like to make a smaller than $10/mo regular contribution - where can I do that please? Thanks!
-
Josef Davies-Coatesreplied to Christine Lemmer-Webber last edited by
@cwebber I think you meant to write "centralized today, in practice" here, right?
-
-
Christine Lemmer-Webberreplied to Octavia con Amore :pink_moon_and_stars: last edited by
@OctaviaConAmore I think there *are* thoughts of expanding it, but also it's that Bluesky's character limit is even smaller, and I was crossposting to both at the same time!
-
Christine Lemmer-Webberreplied to Philippa Cowderoy last edited by
@flippac @shtrom There is also a "perimeter security/reputation" approach that people keep trying over and over again that keeps leading to re-centralization
OCapPub writes about this https://gitlab.com/spritely/ocappub/blob/master/README.org
And we are trying to design to prevent it too
-
@viq it likes pets
-
-
Christine Lemmer-Webberreplied to infinite love โดณ last edited by
@trwnh it's the best hummus