Why does GNOME have a bad reputation?
-
@NostalgicKitsune @BrodieOnLinux @aks @tripplehelix Sorry I accidentally some words, edited.
-
@soller last time I checked, System76 isn't much better either
-
@TheEvilSkeleton The only group that seems to harbor a dislike of System76 are all GNOME contributors!
-
Jeremy Soller 🦀replied to TheEvilSkeleton last edited by [email protected]
@TheEvilSkeleton The only group that seems to harbor a dislike of System76 are GNOME contributors!
It is precisely the "my way or the highway" style y'all have that led to this. Maybe we can block eachother and move on with life?
-
@soller yeah, because GNOME is the only group System76 decided (and miserably failed) to dictate the direction
-
@TheEvilSkeleton What are you talking about?
-
@soller @TheEvilSkeleton Probable it's about COSMIC no longer being a fork of GNOME xD
-
@triskelion @TheEvilSkeleton Thank the gods we don't have to adapt to their choices anymore.
-
@soller why does System76 have a bad reputation?
System76 employee asked and got an answer: https://blogs.gnome.org/christopherdavis/2021/11/10/system76-how-not-to-collaborate/
-
@TheEvilSkeleton Lies and this is still GNOME nonsense
-
@soller it's hard to believe you when the author proves their point
-
@TheEvilSkeleton Blocked.
-
@soller @BrodieOnLinux @[email protected] Speaking about standards, could you please update the cosmic portal to indicate the correct screenshot portal version?
Currently, it returns 2, which indicates that color picking is supported, even though it is not. This leads to mistakes where clients wrongly assume that color picking works.
I've made PR a while ago, but it hasn't seen any response so far.
screenshot: indicate correct version by FineFindus · Pull Request #103 · pop-os/xdg-desktop-portal-cosmic
Return version 1 for the screenshot portal to indicate that the PickColor method is not yet fully supported. This will allow clients to properly check and handle the missing method. Ref: flatpak/xd...
GitHub (github.com)
-
@FineFindus @BrodieOnLinux Sure, I will request a review on this
-
@soller It's such a hard subject really because it challenges the identity of what a DE upstream should be and how standards work on Linux.
My hot take is Gnome should provide technology to make a customised DE so more of a standardisation body than trying to make a tight opinionated product. The more it deviates from being a tech provider to being a product the more upstreams will do their own thing because the experience at distro level should be varied because the use case varies.
-
@shanefagan I think GNOME strives to be a top to bottom integrated environment which is not modular or composable. The advantage of this is you always know what you will be getting. The disadvantage is that distributions have limited space for self expression. GNOME OS seems like the endgame, the full expression of what the project wants to build.
-
@shanefagan COSMIC has an absolute opposite approach of trying to build modularity at all levels. The compositor, panels, applets, lock screen, etc. are all replaceable components.This requires more work on interfaces between these components, and increases the testing required. I hope it drives more cooperation between other projects on cross desktop standards (in wayland-protocols it already has!)
-
Jeremy Soller 🦀replied to Brodie Robertson last edited by
@BrodieOnLinux @aks @tripplehelix I really hope something lands for this. It is a hard problem as positioning cannot always be respected with unique compositors.
-
Mattias Bengtssonreplied to Jeremy Soller 🦀 last edited by
@soller I read the thread and if I understand you correctly GNOME has a bad reputation because developers are being chased and harassed to include code that they don't want to include¹ and they eventually snap. Does that sum it up²?
1: I won't argue the right of a project to decide on its own direction.
2: Please don't answer. You've been behaving like a self-entitled internet troll the entire time I've known of your existence. -
Jeremy Soller 🦀replied to Mattias Bengtsson last edited by
@mattiasb May I ask why you are replying to me if you are not asking for a response? Can you just block me and move on?
