Why does GNOME have a bad reputation?
-
Jeremy Soller 🦀replied to Matthias Klumpp last edited by
@matk @BrodieOnLinux @aks @tripplehelix Thank you for your work!
-
Jeremy Soller 🦀replied to Jasper Vinkenvleugel last edited by
@jvnknvlgl Why is just pointing out the toxic behavior of a GNOME developer such a problem for you? Do you agree with their response?
-
Jasper Vinkenvleugelreplied to Jeremy Soller 🦀 last edited by
@soller first of all, I feel that the “toxic behavior” accusation is quite overblown. This discussion has been going on for years now. I’m not saying that I agree with the response, I’m just saying that I understand where it’s coming from. But I also think that you, a person with a reasonable amount of followers, should know better than to publicly point people to someone you don’t agree with. Having a following comes with a responsibility, whether you like it or not.
-
Jeremy Soller 🦀replied to Jasper Vinkenvleugel last edited by
@jvnknvlgl If you do not want to be called out, please do not post extremely toxic nonsense on a public platform.
-
Jasper Vinkenvleugelreplied to Jeremy Soller 🦀 last edited by
@soller I hope you can understand that the same goes for whatever you’re trying to accomplish here.
-
Jeremy Soller 🦀replied to Jasper Vinkenvleugel last edited by
@jvnknvlgl I would like a few select GNOME developers to stop treating anyone who kindly disagrees with them as bad faith actors with an evil agenda. Yes, there are the haters, but simply asking if SSDs could be supported should not be met with a response involving time machines.
-
Jasper Vinkenvleugelreplied to Jeremy Soller 🦀 last edited by
@soller on the other hand, I would like you to stop sending your multiple thousand followers to someone that has already blocked you for your past behavior. But I suppose we’re not going to agree on any of this, so I wish you all the best.
-
Jeremy Soller 🦀replied to Jasper Vinkenvleugel last edited by
@jvnknvlgl It is simple and easy to delete the post if it is such a problem!
-
Jasper Vinkenvleugelreplied to Jeremy Soller 🦀 last edited by
@soller come om.
-
Jeremy Soller 🦀replied to Jasper Vinkenvleugel last edited by
@jvnknvlgl You are defending a toxic person and shaming me for having too many followers?
-
Jasper Vinkenvleugelreplied to Jeremy Soller 🦀 last edited by
@soller I am shaming you for behaving irresponsibly with the amount of followers you have, that’s something else entirely.
-
Jeremy Soller 🦀replied to Jasper Vinkenvleugel last edited by
@jvnknvlgl Why are you not shaming the person who made a toxic post?
-
Akseli :quake_verified: :kde:replied to Matthias Klumpp last edited by
-
Jeremy Soller 🦀replied to Akseli :quake_verified: :kde: last edited by
-
Matthias Klumppreplied to Jeremy Soller 🦀 last edited by
@soller @aks The biggest issue faced by the protocol is that Wayland was designed to be fully declarative, so clients tell it what they intend to do and the compositor does it for them, instead of clients telling the compositor explicitly what they want. Zones bring quite a chunk of imperative behavior with their placement hints, and some Wayland people and compositor devs dislike that...
(But it's IMHO necessary, even though less "pure") -
Jeremy Soller 🦀replied to Matthias Klumpp last edited by