Nobody hates working together with leftists more than other leftists
-
Isn't it a little weird to call vegans who say eating meat is murder a "loud minority", and then explaining why you cannot be a vegan without saying that eating meat is murder (hyperbole or not)?
Is there something in your comment I'm missing, or is this supposed to be some self-aware joke?
-
-
-
Are eggs meat? And don't you think that part „I don't care if your family starves“ might be fucking important context?
-
No, that is not at all everything that bottom left guy says.
I don't want to have the same discussion twice simultaneously, so: https://discuss.tchncs.de/comment/16162457
-
-
The only thing worse than a heathen is a heretic!
-
My point exactly! I don't see where the discrepancy lies.
Maybe that calling someone a murderous cultist is not the same as saying their family should rather starve?
Maybe that calling someone a murderous cultist is not the same as saying their family should rather starve?
this shouldn't be ones reaction anyway regardless if you are in a "murderous cultist" or not. And maybe this post was just a hyperbole and caricature of hyper militant vegans?
-
I mean... If they didn't believe veganism had a moral high ground they wouldn't be doing it. That's something and badgering people about how eating meat is literally murder is something else.
-
Getting the average omnivore down to the recommended 6-8 ounces of meat per day would make a tremendous difference on its own. I really didn’t know how much excess protein I was consuming until I made some vegan and vegetarian friends.
-
Maybe that calling someone a murderous cultist is not the same as saying their family should rather starve?
this shouldn't be ones reaction anyway regardless if you are in a "murderous cultist" or not. And maybe this post was just a hyperbole and caricature of hyper militant vegans?
And maybe this post was just a hyperbole and caricature of hyper militant vegans?
And my comment critizises this post for displaying hyper militant vegans as the norm. But everyone apparently just wants to get all railed up and shit.
-
Are eggs meat? And don't you think that part „I don't care if your family starves“ might be fucking important context?
"Are eggs meat?" - Yes, that's what I'm saying, I'm not sure how it can be understood any other way.
Though, how can calling somebody a murderous cultist not be considered the least bit demeaning, whereas saying their family should starve is? As per "You wouldn’t say „... I do respect your religious tradition of human sacrifice“" having similar aggressive or demeaning meaning as "I don’t care if your family starves".
-
And maybe this post was just a hyperbole and caricature of hyper militant vegans?
And my comment critizises this post for displaying hyper militant vegans as the norm. But everyone apparently just wants to get all railed up and shit.
But everyone apparently just wants to get all railed up and shit.
Its much more fun to be railed up and sweaty.
And yeah I totally agree with your initial comment and your scolding of OP; even though I am more like a flexitarian than a vegetarian, allthough I really try to shift my died toward it.
Also your comment score immediatly got two negatives... I guess the peeps are super railed up against you, which is sad.
-
Maybe that calling someone a murderous cultist is not the same as saying their family should rather starve?
this shouldn't be ones reaction anyway regardless if you are in a "murderous cultist" or not. And maybe this post was just a hyperbole and caricature of hyper militant vegans?
That would have been the first statement: "Vegan here, bottom left is a very small but sometimes very loud minority."
That second statement (about the religious killings) was specifically for why finding compromise is not possible for regular vegans. Even if it was a hyperbole, it would be meaningless if not sincere.
-
This post did not contain any content.
And then, to perfectly demonstrate your point: 90% of this comments section!
-
"Are eggs meat?" - Yes, that's what I'm saying, I'm not sure how it can be understood any other way.
Though, how can calling somebody a murderous cultist not be considered the least bit demeaning, whereas saying their family should starve is? As per "You wouldn’t say „... I do respect your religious tradition of human sacrifice“" having similar aggressive or demeaning meaning as "I don’t care if your family starves".
Are eggs meat?" - Yes, that's what I'm saying, I'm not sure how it can be understood any other way.
Then you're just plain wrong. Is a woman's unfertilized egg a baby?
Though, how can calling somebody a murderous cultist not be considered the least bit demeaning, whereas saying their family should starve is? As per "You wouldn’t say „... I do respect your religious tradition of human sacrifice“" having similar aggressive or demeaning meaning as "I don’t care if your family starves".
You're twisting my words like they're players in a game with colored dots on a map.
I even stated that the sacrifice thing was a damn hyperbole. If you think.my comment is demeaning or aggressive, you didn't read the whole fucking thing. -
Same. People literally can not comprehend that I accept whole heartedly that I believe many of the things that I do and continue to do to be immoral.
Yeah, maybe I love meat too much and I'm too weak. That has absolutely nothing to do with how I establish my moral compass.
I'd like to be a truely good person, but I'll be goddamned if the way I do that is lowering the bar to where I already stand.
-
That would have been the first statement: "Vegan here, bottom left is a very small but sometimes very loud minority."
That second statement (about the religious killings) was specifically for why finding compromise is not possible for regular vegans. Even if it was a hyperbole, it would be meaningless if not sincere.
Putting shit together and reading stuff as a whole is not your strength, is it buddy? If I said „2+2=5 is wrong“ you'd be pissed off about „2+2=5“ and just ignore the „is wrong“ part.
-
That would have been the first statement: "Vegan here, bottom left is a very small but sometimes very loud minority."
That second statement (about the religious killings) was specifically for why finding compromise is not possible for regular vegans. Even if it was a hyperbole, it would be meaningless if not sincere.
Uh, did you skipped the negation? That a regular vegan wouldn't go full on condemning you for religious Human Sacrifice by eating meat?
