This is possibly one of the more cursed single sentences I've ever seen in a job posting

Irenes (many)

@aud @xris @xgranade absolutely agreed. it is fundamentally not possible for LLMs in their current form to do anything about reliability or testing their output against reality, and none of the lines of research we're aware of that are getting venture capital or institutional investment would change that, even if successful

Asta [AMP]

@[email protected] @[email protected] @[email protected] Right? And, well, actually, even the testing is probably difficult without introducing the idea of "reasonable error"... and considering the "reasonable error" for these types of systems is "0. precisely 0. it's a fucking airplane."

welp

Glyph

@SnoopJ @xgranade @aud +1000 to "we are absolutely not serious about this". I would bet on this company's success if they quietly swapped out the LLM for the guts of an extant COBOL compiler

Asta [AMP]

@[email protected] @[email protected] @[email protected] agreed. Since this is how they wrote their pitch to developers interested in applying, though, I suspect they may well go bankrupt before realizing that.

Asta [AMP]

@[email protected] @[email protected] @[email protected] "we are improving drug delivery through injections by adding noise to our hand motions!"

SpookJ 👻

@aud @glyph @xgranade I almost wonder if the target market is actually phase one/investigatory contracts: banking on a stronger bid (because you may trick the fool on the other side with Today's Hokum) and never planning to go beyond that.

COBOL always makes me think "IRS" out of the gate, but I guess there's *some* bank/etc. code out there that might be under the kind of credulous management that might toss a few million at this kind of "maybe it'll work"

Probably giving them too much credit…

Irenes (many)

@SnoopJ @aud @glyph @xgranade oh if we were talking mere millions, this would have happened a long time ago

Asta [AMP]

@[email protected] @[email protected] @[email protected] Honestly, I suspect half the startups throwing "LLM" or "AI" in their company descriptions are basically just an elaborate funding scam in one form or another. I'm sure some business types without a foundation in the field they're attempting to wade into genuinely don't realize the technology literally can't even; I'm sure others will quietly pivot away from LLMs for it (it's possible they're not even seriously considering them); and then some others probably have some sort of money loop where the money goes to contracting all their friends or who knows what the fuck.

Asta [AMP]

@[email protected] @[email protected] @[email protected] @[email protected] I should just learn COBOL and then get funding to create COBOL 2: COBOLLIN' since it seems like there's a lot of money to rake in there.

I mean how hard could it be*

Cassandra Granade 🏳️‍⚧️

@aud @SnoopJ @glyph @ireneista COBOL has classes now.

Asta [AMP]

@[email protected] @[email protected] @[email protected] @[email protected] wait, if I want funding, I don't think I even have to know COBOL before pitching "CO-BALLIN'"

Asta [AMP]

@[email protected] @[email protected] @[email protected] @[email protected] oh good, I'll take one*

*(this is a joke; I assume you mean in the OO sense)

Asta [AMP]

@[email protected] @[email protected] @[email protected] @[email protected] (I'm just going into founder mode)

Cassandra Granade 🏳️‍⚧️

@aud @SnoopJ @glyph @ireneista http://www.coboloncogs.org/HOME.HTM

Irenes (many)

@aud @SnoopJ @glyph @xgranade yeah when we did our DB/C thing it was very interesting because you could see how four decades of new innovations in programming languages had been retrofitted onto it one by one

Cassandra Granade 🏳️‍⚧️

@ireneista @aud @SnoopJ @glyph What's that about FORTRAN?

Cassandra Granade 🏳️‍⚧️

@ireneista @aud @SnoopJ @glyph What's that about C++?

Asta [AMP]

@[email protected] @[email protected] @[email protected] @[email protected] Is this a riff of ruby on rails?! Because that's kind of amazing

Could do a whole ass sequence on that!
Python on Pipes
C on the Sea
PHP on PCP

Irenes (many)

@xgranade @aud @SnoopJ @glyph haha siiiiiigh

there was a time when NASA was still using FORTRAN for new code; we don't know if that's the case today. compared to C it didn't have pointer-aliasing problems, which meant it could apply optimizations more often in numeric code

Asta [AMP]

@[email protected] @[email protected] @[email protected] @[email protected] "no no, C++ is good now, you just need to use C++46!"