Hahahaha whaaaaaaat
-
@jalefkowit given the 50-year history of goalpost-moving around the entire concept of "artificial intelligence", something like this does seem necessary
-
Jason Lefkowitzreplied to Irenes (many) last edited by [email protected]
@ireneista Life gets a lot easier when you can solve philosophical problems by pointing at your accountant and saying "you are a philosopher now"
-
@ireneista @jalefkowit I mean it also just says everything about these people, right? "AGI is when it makes $100bn" is absolutely what we should have expected.
Imagine OpenAI building a real artificial superintelligence and it not officially counting because it doesn't think that making $100bn is a worthy goal
-
@andrewt @ireneista @jalefkowit ...or thinks reaching the goal would have undesirable outcomes for it!
-
Jason Lefkowitzreplied to Philippa Cowderoy last edited by
@flippac @andrewt @ireneista Obligatory
-
@jalefkowit i had negative expectations and yet im still disappointed
-
@SRAZKVT Who says they're not innovating
-
@jalefkowit is something intelligent if it doesn’t generate profit? Need to rethink our assessments of Einstein…
-
Jason Lefkowitzreplied to Michael Wyman last edited by [email protected]
@mwyman Speaking of Einstein
-
N [email protected] shared this topic
-
P [email protected] shared this topic
-
@jalefkowit And here I thought it was the memeslop images we made along the way...
-
G [email protected] shared this topic
-
This post is deleted!
-
This post is deleted!
-
Now that we've all had fun clowning on the idea of defining AGI by a dollar amount, let the Corporate Cynic in me suggest a rational series of steps that could produce this outcome.
-
Jason Lefkowitzreplied to Jason Lefkowitz last edited by [email protected]
(NB: Yes I am salty that I had to post that Notes app-style because of the character limit)
