@[email protected] Gonna have to agree on RMS with that one.
-
@[email protected] Gonna have to agree on RMS with that one.
-
@[email protected] and you already know how hard it was for me to bite my tongue and just go "Yeah I'll agree with RMS" lol
-
@[email protected] to be fair the guy says a lot of genuine things
-
la fillette révolutionnairereplied to Amber 🌸 last edited by@puppygirlhornypost2 i agree with rms on most of his takes on politics and software freedom
-
P [email protected] shared this topic
-
Amber 🌸replied to la fillette révolutionnaire last edited by
@[email protected] yeah i can agree with that.
-
@puppygirlhornypost2 @lizzy many others to agree with here without mentioning the libertarians. i think stallman's "freedom 0" to "use the software for any purpose" (like weapons or surveillance) forms a direct through line to the "open source" movement (use the software without giving back to the commons) of the OSI, which culminated in their "open source 'AI'" definition recently that does not require training data to be open source
-
d@nny "disc@" mc²replied to d@nny "disc@" mc² last edited by
@puppygirlhornypost2 @lizzy i think free software based on sheer libertarianism is ideologically incoherent and was always doomed to fail
-
d@nny "disc@" mc²replied to d@nny "disc@" mc² last edited by
@puppygirlhornypost2 @lizzy we do need rights—freedom concieved as purely negative liberty does not secure rights, it is a rejection of rights. we need positive liberties which have always been missing from the software licensing discussion
-
📞ELOY 🔜 38C3replied to d@nny "disc@" mc² last edited by
@hipsterelectron @puppygirlhornypost2 @lizzy huh, isn't copyleft about positive freedom?
