People are all different

[damnedfurry@lemmy.world]

The implication that only asexuals ever have anything on their minds other than sex is more than a bit ridiculous.

[piousagnostic@lemmy.world]

"Gay uncle hypothosis" people that don't reproduce increase the likely hood of children surviving, by providing resources to those they love that do reproduce.

[kichae@lemmy.ca]

Yes, yes, of course. Why didn't the author think about you in all of this?

[kichae@lemmy.ca]

We, uh, reproduce just fine. Having few to no sexual urges is rather different from never having sex. Plenty of people eat even when they're not hungry, or for reasons other than hinger.

Asexuality and sex-repulsion are orthogonal spectra.

[scribbd@feddit.nl]

"I like pancakes" "So you hate waffles?"

[noodle07@lemmy.world]

I'm not ace but I really need cuddles too

[lemminary@lemmy.world]

Biologists have been pondering why homosexuality is so prevalent in the animal kingdom and their explanation for this is a positive evolutionary pressure that benefits the species.

[lugal@sopuli.xyz]

#teamwaffles

[lugal@sopuli.xyz]

it refers to the one cake. "You can't have a cake and eat another one" would be yours.

But I like your attitude! Can you make me two cakes? I'm totally not going to eat both of them (I am but don't tell anyone)

[deegeese@sopuli.xyz]

Two cakes? Not with this egg shortage.

[carbonicedragon@pawb.social]

I was taking it to refer to just some amount of possessed cake regardless of its subdivisions, It doesnt strike me as odd to refer to food that way (same as how, if I made you a bunch of french fries, it wouldn't be terribly unusual for me to ask "do you like it?" while referring to the meal, despite it being made up of many individual units).

[paradachshund@lemmy.today]

Maybe you're ahungry

sorry, I'll see myself out

[sixtyforce@sh.itjust.works]

Same taste, more surface area.

[mnemonicmonkeys@sh.itjust.works]

This is the original, better version

[acockworkorange@mander.xyz]

What is something you wish normies stopped doing to you?

[acockworkorange@mander.xyz]

I have never understood this saying.

[thisbenzingring@lemmy.sdf.org]

you can't have your thing if you also eat it (it will be gone inside of you)

[acockworkorange@mander.xyz]

But if it’s yours, didn’t you have it?

[thisbenzingring@lemmy.sdf.org]

but it isn't the thing anymore, so no its is now something different while soon to become a poop

[acockworkorange@mander.xyz]

Okay. Got it. Thanks!