70,000 attendees, in November?
-
70,000 attendees, in November?
*Loud swearing*
Slow clap for the anti harassment policy.
No public health policy of course.
Pay 775 euros for the privilege of concrud with potential life threatening consequences.
But yeah YOLO for the "Glastonbury for Geeks".
FFS.
-
Kate Nyhanreplied to Esther Payne :bisexual_flag: on last edited by
@onepict
At first I though you could be talking about the American Public Health Association meeting - but that's in October, not November.
Their health and safety policy: -
@onepict
I'm sure that "minimizing face touching" will help reduce the spread of COVID aerosols ️ -
@onepict
And check out the theme: -
@onepict
Good luck to their efforts to "rebuild trust in public health and science" while they are A still refusing to accept that COVID is airborne and B still pretending that COVID (acute and long) is no big deal. "Prevention and promotion to enable populations to live longer, healthier lives," my eye. -
Esther Payne :bisexual_flag:replied to Kate Nyhan on last edited by
@kdnyhan oh wow that's just so clueless.
I was talking about Web summit.
Having been to Offshore Europe in the past, large scale events have little appeal.
70000 extra folks in Lisbon? That'll be worse than Brussels with FOSDEM.
-
Esther Payne :bisexual_flag:replied to Esther Payne :bisexual_flag: on last edited by
@kdnyhan I've just got so much fatigue from seeing these events publicised with not so much as a public health policy.
When we ask and put pressure on, we're accused of bullying.
I'd like to go to events again in Europe. But clearly we're not wanted at them.