How Decentralized Is Bluesky Really?

teledyn 𓂀

@bhaugen @smallcircles @serapath @cwebber

A third choice has ample precedent:

3. find several competing economic networks working on the same solution, convince them to cooperate, pool resources and share the burden. This was the motivation and support for X-Window, the backers backed BECAUSE they didn't trust each other!

Consider for example, municipal public Works tracking. No one community would have the resources, but together, internationally, all it needs is coordination

smallcircles (Humanity Now 🕊)

@serapath @cwebber

Open source is everywhere and won. Agreed. FOSS ate the world.

Open source maintainers however. Esp. the free software types.. poor folks. That includes me too, sadly.

If people earning decent sustainable income is a criterium, then FOSS has failed and is inherently unsustainable. Even more so because mosts the fruits of its near-slave labour (not talking hobbyists) are harvested by fat smiling corporate farmers, plucked, low-hanging fruit.

Protected by a license sticker.

amd

@evan I’d be curious to hear more about your thoughts here.

I have worked in extremely patent laden spaces and I have never shied away from reading them as ignorance doesn’t offer a defense (in the US at least). I would read everything I could with the intention to be aware of the shape of the field and force my inventions to be developed to avoid them.

Is there something different about your space that allows you to be willfully unaware and somehow insulates your work?

@cwebber @bnewbold

𝓼𝓮𝓻𝓪𝓹𝓪𝓽𝓱【ツ】☮(📍🇬🇧)

@teledyn @bhaugen @smallcircles @cwebber

i think this is a grwat suggestion.

But the way you describe it sounds like:

1. networking, politics ans bureaucracy, so not the path of least resitance open to the masses.
2. wouldnt work for a codec or parser or sort algorithm or any of the myriads of little open source modules individuals couplld create

I do believe (3.) as you say IS the answer, but absolutely not in its current form. This has to become as easy as a pull request and merge

Evan Prodromou

@amd @cwebber @bnewbold I don't know.

I wish that Bluesky would publish an open, royalty-free patent license on AT so this wasn't a problem for anyone else in the space.

In the open standards world, we typically only consider work from other open standards, specifically for this reason. So, basing a W3C spec on an IETF RFC.

So my experience here is slim.

Evan Prodromou

@amd @cwebber @bnewbold my understanding is that AT Proto is significantly different enough from ActivityPub in its architecture that it's unlikely we'll stumble across some technique it uses by mistake.

So I think it's a better idea to just steer clear and follow our own path.

Evan Prodromou

@amd @cwebber @bnewbold Brian is in the SocialCG at W3C, so if he thinks some ideas from AT should be used by others, he has the opportunity to publish them as CG reports. These are an extremely lightweight way to give assurance to the community.

Report Requirements | Community and Business Groups

(www.w3.org)

Evan Prodromou

@amd @cwebber @bnewbold I think we can assume that if he doesn't submit those techniques, the company is not interested in sharing them.

smallcircles (Humanity Now 🕊)

@serapath @teledyn @bhaugen @cwebber

I also believe that. During my years facilitating SocialHub and years before, in Humane Tech Community I founded, I learned a lot of hard lessons on what "community" is good for, and what not.

Fostering community is NOT a good choice when scope is broad, audiences very diverse.

It waters down the cohesion between members, discussions going all directions. And it is too hard to provide incentives that lead to *intrinsic* motivation to actively participate.

smallcircles (Humanity Now 🕊)

@serapath @teledyn @bhaugen @cwebber

Not a good choice for volunteer-driven community that is. A paid stuff might uphold some marginally functioning community against the forces of nature. They are paid to afford the time and energy investment.

Grassroots ecosystems, e.g. fedi and foss cannot be "orchestrated" into doing something collectively and then maintain / evolve it too. No "herding of cats" here.

Instead social dynamics must be accounted for. Figure out what intrinsically motivates.

smallcircles (Humanity Now 🕊)

@serapath @teledyn @bhaugen @cwebber

So we need to think in "movements" here, imho. How do we get a mass to shift in the right direction? Well, by channeling it.

The biggest weakness in grassroots movement is also part of its strength. All these individuals following own nose, doing as they wish. They are like gas particles, moving all directions.

Ungovernable particles on their own. This lends resilience. Problem is, there is no directed force to punch with, and solve real problems together.

smallcircles (Humanity Now 🕊)

@serapath @teledyn @bhaugen @cwebber

To get the mass of particles to act in unison you need a charged electro-magnetic field to energize them. A rallying cry, a shared vision.

Still not enough. This only aligns noses to face the south pole of progress together.

Last thing we need is to learn to tweak the ripples and fluctuations in the force field between particles, such that they happily dance together in harmony and choreagraph into these beautiful self-adapting standing waves patterns.

smallcircles (Humanity Now 🕊)

@serapath @teledyn @bhaugen @cwebber

That is one analogy that appeals to me, at least. Another, better one, is seeking analogies with nature.

How does a grassroots movement organize itself?

Answer: Similar to how autonomous cells acting together form a living breathing organism.

Technically an event-driven architecture

Or: Like vast mycelium networks upon which mushrooms exchange nutrients to thrive and clone themselves.

P2P local-first state synchronisation? Semantic knowledge network?

smallcircles (Humanity Now 🕊)

@serapath @teledyn @bhaugen @cwebber

Analogies, good. Inspiration by nature and mimicry then..

- Only organic growth and evolution.
- Foster spontaneous emergence.
- Find natural growth paths on-the-fly.
- Every individual participant is free.
- Seek incentives to align and converge.
- Seek for intrinsic motivation to contibute.
- Heart, passion, dreams are fuel to ignite.

Very different than how the biz world operates. Traditional biz practices are no good match to model our governance.

smallcircles (Humanity Now 🕊)

@serapath @teledyn @bhaugen @cwebber

There are alternative technology adoption models that are better matches for what we need.

Challenge: Fixing the Fediverse Technology Adoption Lifecycle

Background These are just some notes related to my observation that: On Fediverse Ad-hoc Interoperability dominates and hampers innovation. Need to clarify some terminology that I frequently use relating to Social Co…

Discuss Social Coding (discuss.coding.social)

These inspired me to start social coding movement. I am working on a concept, that has all these characteristics, and can be both be a design model and organizational formula (adding an as yet missing layer at ecosystem level), that can be supported by apps, automated services & tools on the social web..

And can evolve that web subsequently.

smallcircles (Humanity Now 🕊)

@serapath @teledyn @bhaugen @cwebber

This concept I call "prosperity guilds" and is based on an overarching strategy of "leveraging the ecosystem" and charge the gas to have punching power

Main theme is "inherent (holistic) sustainability at any time, during the entire lifecycle of an initiative". That is the foundation to build on.

Sustainability so that e.g. FOSS projects don't shrivel as tiny mushrooms and die, but grow vast mycorrhiza networks with plenty fresh & independent offshoot.

smallcircles (Humanity Now 🕊)

@serapath @teledyn @bhaugen @cwebber

With a proper conceptual model, a good enough domain design for "commons-driven adaptive adhocracy" we can drill down to what protocols and architecture support best match.

Regardless of under-the-hood tech, I hope we enter an era of app-free computing, where services choreograph into dynamic social experiences tailored to satisfy needs and adaptive to the context of the social interactions that take place between people.

And thriving service ecosystems.

𝓼𝓮𝓻𝓪𝓹𝓪𝓽𝓱【ツ】☮(📍🇬🇧)

@smallcircles @teledyn @bhaugen @cwebber

i disagree.
git is a good example and nom as well.

git the tool and npm the tool was enough to create enormous open source supply chains, a.k.a dependency trees

smallcircles (Humanity Now 🕊)

@serapath @teledyn @bhaugen @cwebber

Sure. But I was more holistically referring to all the processes and people involved throughout the free software development lifecycle and within its larger environment, and how then deliverables come about. Then git is but one of many tools and practices in the supply chain that allowed for this robust organization structures to emerge.