With respect to #ActivityPub
-
Ben Pate π€π»replied to kopper [according to whom?] :colon_three: last edited by
This is a good point, and I don't have everything worked out, here. HTTP signatures are consistently the #1 pain point, so I'm looking for some kind of solution.
In theory, I'd like DMs to be E2E encrypted, so posting them anywhere in plaintext already seems like an anti-pattern. But, that would be an even bigger hurdle to jump in a project that's probably too ambitious, already.
@kopper @hrefna @jenniferplusplus @sebinthestars @puppygirlhornypost2 @lily
-
The primary question, now, is: "Do we think we should have a discussion about HTTP signatures, and various ways to replace them?"
I'm not committed to simply throwing them away with no replacement, but, by including this in the discussion it seems like the answer to the primary question is "yes". We may not have good solutions, and we may not even have a consensus, but it sounds like we should have a discussion.
@hrefna @jenniferplusplus @kopper @sebinthestars @puppygirlhornypost2 @lily
-
smallcircles (Humanity Now π)replied to Helge last edited by
-
smallcircles (Humanity Now π)replied to smallcircles (Humanity Now π) last edited by
@benpate @lily @jenniferplusplus @puppygirlhornypost2 @hrefna @helge
FYI Helge has followed-up with a topic to collect our ideas for vNext social web and define a vision.
Wiki: Vision for a Fedi Specification
Social Web Protocol Considerations Wiki Post. Please Participate! First read the Introduction by @helge. Status β :brain: Brainstorming. Gathering feedback. Contents :muscle: Co-creation log β¦
Discuss Social Coding (discuss.coding.social)
-
Helgereplied to smallcircles (Humanity Now π) last edited by
Thanks for the push again. Currently, I'm in a state of self doubt if I actually wrote what needs to be written. This means I prefer taking it slow.
However, I'm bad at organizing and getting people involved. So it's probably better to use wider announcements? Not sure.
-
@benpate @puppygirlhornypost2 @hrefna @jenniferplusplus @lily
Looking at the key issues discussed, I am not sure I'm thinking in the same direction. These suggestions feel like they're more focused on the UX of implementations, and not addressing shortcomings of AP as a protocol. I am generally aligned with what @jenniferplusplus is saying, particularly the lack of stated goals being the main driver of divergence in implementation. Adding more client capabilities just hides the fact there's no accepted answer here.
-
@benpate @puppygirlhornypost2 @hrefna @jenniferplusplus @lily That's not to say this isn't a useful and valid discussion, I just don't think these points will solve AP's deeper issues.
-
smallcircles (Humanity Now π)replied to Helge last edited by
Taking it slow is good. I think there's no hurry as long as we keep making some concrete steps.
We've all had very long period of fleety discussions, some of us taken concrete notes, or even doing serious legwork. There should be enough input to be collected and distilled into some comprehensive format.
-
@sebinthestars @puppygirlhornypost2 @hrefna @jenniferplusplus @lily
Thanks for this! What would you say are APβs biggest shortcomings? What would be the goals/principles that we SHOULD follow?
This list is primarily from my own experience. Iβm posting it as a way to start this conversation.
Thereβs already tons of great feedback that I need to incorporate, so please help me with this, too.
-
smallcircles (Humanity Now π)replied to smallcircles (Humanity Now π) last edited by