Thinking out loud about my own activism and getting more involved.
-
The Yangsi Michael Dillonreplied to Sam Whited last edited by
@sam It can also be a very legitimate action strategy to make yourself hard to detect (and ultimately kill)
-
Sam Whitedreplied to The Yangsi Michael Dillon last edited by
@anantagd oh yah, totally agree. I come from a position of privilege and feel like I should use that to protect others, but I definitely wouldn't blame someone who's trans, an immigrant, or anyone else the new administration will vilify for becoming less involved to make themselves less visible. That's definitely legit.
-
@sam Not sure if you want opinions here, but given your stated concerns, I think meeting groups where they are is probably a good idea. If you're still concerned about the opsec drawbacks of their chosen venues (and you should be) then I'd recommend involving yourself in their opsec decisions when you get there. Help them draft policy on what uses of a VC-funded tech are safe and reasonable. Help them set up alternatives if possible.
But never login to Twitter again. That's the master's tools now.
-
Hi Sam, this just came up on my timeline and maybe that’s kind of related? It could be good to help those groups improve their security, I guess.
Thomas 🔭🕹️ (@[email protected])
Americans: Please read, follow and share. You should have a plan for your digital security, which will be under attack by the Trump regime very soon. https://ssd.eff.org
Hachyderm.io (hachyderm.io)
-
@nellie_m Thanks! I wasn't even thinking about doing this from a security perspective, but that's probably a good idea too. One of the reasons I haven't tried to bring up changing it in meetings is I don't want people to feel like I'm the new person jumping in, refusing to try the way it is currently, insisting on doing it my way or I won't participate, etc. so I just say "sorry I'm not on discord" and haven't tried to push for change. But a security approach seems much more reasonable.
-
yes, that’s always the hard thing to figure out for me , too - how not to come across as the pushy knowitall when some friends are overwhelmed with their lives anyway. Trying to fight disinformation and extremists’ narrativee etc. But at the same time they so willingly give away all their private information to Meta, Google and Co. it drives me insane.
-
@sam You could help them set up a chat bridge or access their chats through a Slidge XMPP gateway? It's not perfect, but at least it would allow you to participate and raise awareness that better options exist.
-
Some things are downright scary. Imagine the Third Reich had had the technology we have today.
Or a Fourth Reich …
BrianKrebs (@[email protected])
Attached: 1 image I thought I understood the extent to which the broad availability of mobile location data has exacerbated countless privacy and security challenges. That is, until I was invited along with four other publications to be a virtual observer in a 2-week test run of Babel Street, a service that lets users draw a digital polygon around nearly any location on a map of the world, and view a time-lapse history of the mobile devices seen coming in and out of the area. The issue isn't that there's some dodgy company offering this as a poorly-vetted service: It's that *anyone* willing to spend a little money can now build this capability themselves. I'll be updating this story with links to reporting from other publications also invited, including 404 Media, Haaretz, NOTUS, and The New York Times. All of these stories will make clear that mobile location data is set to massively complicate several hot-button issues, from the tracking of suspected illegal immigrants or women seeking abortions, to harassing public servants who are already in the crosshairs over baseless conspiracy theories and increasingly hostile political rhetoric against government employees. https://krebsonsecurity.com/2024/10/the-global-surveillance-free-for-all-in-mobile-ad-data/
Infosec Exchange (infosec.exchange)
-
@kris I don't do tech stuff for any org anymore and I don't think anyone would use it. For chat we've got to recognize that it *will* be worse in most ways than using Discord. I'm not sure how to get people over that hurdle.
-
@nellie_m that's a good reminder, thanks.
-
@upstreamism thanks, opinions are indeed welcome! Honestly, I wasn't even thinking about this from an opsec perspective, just from a not wanting to support those products personally and not wanting to be that arrogant guy who shows up and immediately gets petulant about a decision that was democratically decided by the rest of the org. Opsec is a legit good reason not to use those things anymore though that I'd feel less bad about pushing for change with that as the reason. Thanks!
