I'm surprised that no one has used ActivityPub to federate block and allow lists.
-
I'm surprised that no one has used ActivityPub to federate block and allow lists. All they are is a collection of actors. Even the instances themselves could be classified as a Service (which is a type of actor).
#ActivityPub #federation #fediverse -
BeAware :fediverse:replied to Bryan Redeagle on last edited by
@bryan this is being worked on by Mastodon and is in the roadmap.
-
@bryan @smallcircles I did look into the viability of this, but ultimately decided against it due to addressing issues and lack of appropriate activity & object types — would've basically been inventing an entirely new vocabulary on top of AP.
-
@[email protected] @[email protected] It seems like it could be as easy as a collection of actors on another field like following currently is. It would break the spec, but a few fediverse apps do that already.
-
Tim Chambers - VOTEDreplied to Bryan Redeagle on last edited by
-
@thisismissem @bryan @smallcircles that's absolutely the right thing to do! It's an extensible protocol. Also, I think the `Block` activity is fine for this situation.
-
BeAware :fediverse:replied to Emelia 👸🏻 on last edited by
@thisismissem @bryan So, that being said, does that mean it should no longer be on the roadmap?
Wondering because I also replied to the post thinking that it was still being looked into.
Thanks ahead of time.
