Bad Influence.

[palordrolap@fedia.io]

If you're killing the cow in the same way the people in those videos kill cats, then it doesn't hit much different at all.

There's definitely a line here, but I suspect that we disagree on where that line is.

[milicent_bystandr@lemm.ee]

I mean, 1984 isn't really age appropriate for children anyway. Not from the authoritarianism, but sexual and violent content and themes.

[alecsadler@sh.itjust.works]

Or replace cats with billionaires.

[enkers@sh.itjust.works]

If you think cows are killed in anything but abject horror, I'd recommend you at the very least watch Dominion, which was linked above.

[olgratin_magmatoe@slrpnk.net]

If you're dedicated you can find anything. That's not the point though.

[lugal@sopuli.xyz]

Literally 1984

[macncheezus@lemmy.today]

I understand, but my point is that it really doesn’t take any more effort than going to the library does. In fact, it’s certainly no more difficult than looking up videos of animal cruelty (at least I don’t exactly just see them being suggested to me randomly).

[naught@sh.itjust.works]

at least the cat stretched its legs once or twice whereas the cows were stuck in torturous positions their entire miserable life, steeped in their own shit on the verge of suffocation due to crowding. its all fucked

[naught@sh.itjust.works]

see, this is what is being pointed out in the meme. Children are exposed to violence and sexuality every single day. Just because children shouldn't be committing violence or having sex doesn't mean they can't read about it or know about it. Also how fucking ridiculous is it that we place violence and sex in the same sentence w similar weight.

[thanksforallthefish@sh.itjust.works]

I'm not trying to cause offence, but is there an ethical way to eat animals, or does it become unethical as soon as we have the means and ability to not do so?

It seams like for a lot of people, thier traditions and culture outweigh thier personal ethical benefits and thats the biggest problem that has to be overcome.
Some places do not allow for growing sufficient and complete protein to feed the population, for example Egypt or Bangladesh. It seems that the cultures might be harder to overcome in these places.

I was thinking maybe insects as a protein source would be a positive step for these locations. But thats obviously hard to overcome culturally. What do vegans think of eating insects?

[industrystandard@lemmy.world]

Eerie timing

[milicent_bystandr@lemm.ee]

Have you read 1984? I have, and in my opinion it is inappropriate for children.

I also feel videos showing people killing cats are inappropriate for children, and I think most people agree on that.

The meme is pointing out the incongruity there. But it's being taken as if people are allowing the cat killing videos therefore we should allow 1984 for children. And also implying the problem with 1984 is about political influence or such like. Rather, the problem (wrt children) is the way it handles adult themes, and also we should be protecting children from the cat killing videos also.

[ourkaos@lemmy.today]

Was born March 20th, 2006. He'll be 19 in a couple months.

[bothsidesistfraud@lemmy.world]

I can only surmise the point here is a fact-free circlejerk completely lacking in humor or self-awareness?

[rooskie91@discuss.online]

Is 1984 banned? That was mandatory reading...

[enkers@sh.itjust.works]

Veganism seeks to exclude animal exploitation and cruelty as far as is possible and practicable.

For a Western audience, where one would have access to a well stocked supermarket, that would generally mean a complete boycott, but it does ultimately come down to the individual to decide what is and isn't practicable. If you have nessary medication that contains animal products, or is tested on animals, for example, I don't think you'd find anyone expecting you to give that up.

As for insects, they're within the kingdom of Animalia, so yes, veganism applies to them too. That said, you can't go through life without ever stepping on an ant, and I don't know anyone who'd place the exact same value on an fly and a cow. One has a vastly more sophisticated brain and nervous system.

Ultimately it's a "do your best" situation.

[camr_on@lemmy.world]

Animal cruelty maybe not, but I know a few friends who get randomly shown car crashed and combat recordings and the like. I agree with your sentiment for the most part, but I think the real point is that books that should be required reading for young minds are being banned, while the majority of young people are on sites that will show you all kinds of crazy shit to keep you scrolling

[kolanaki@yiffit.net]

It and Fahrenheit 451 are, ironically, among some of the most banned books in the US.

[essteeyou@lemmy.world]

Ignoring the 1984 element for now, this has interested me for a long time.

In the US if a movie contains nudity then its age classification is going to be high, the same as if it contained murder, torture, or other violent actions.

In Germany, anecdotally, nudity is rated as appropriate for a much younger audience than violence.

It makes a lot of sense to me, but I understand why it would take forever to adjust from "puritanical" values to something more open as an entire nation, for example.

I feel like I'm more inclined to go with the FSK rating than the US equivalents, or the UK ones, but that's my viewpoint, complete with all my bias.

[naught@sh.itjust.works]

I read it in middle school and it was one of my favorite books for years after. The topics are not too adult for school. We should obviously protect children, but prudishness and politics should not dictate school libraries