Ai bubble

[email protected]

How do I use it “correctly”

[email protected]

"Correctly " is a term that has several different uses and meanings. Depending on the context, "Correctly" can mean:

[email protected]

We're talking about the bubble here, not reasonable use cases.

(⬤ᴥ⬤)

i really really do not trust any of those cunts with agi.

Ephera

They're decent at language tasks. So, if you provide them with all the information and configure them to not make up any of their own, then they can do things like rewriting it in a different style or different language relatively competently.

[email protected]

Now imagine how people who've waited for the bitcoin bubble to burst feel

[email protected]

Me waiting for the housing market:

[email protected]

Nah. They just believe it will make stock values increase (or that not doing thr AI thing will cause stock values to decrease).

Remember, a publically traded company produces shareholder value. How they do it doesn't matter.

[email protected]

and configure them to not make up any of their own

That's the trillion dollar puzzle nobody has been able to solve yet. It's not trivial at all, even when it seems like it should be.

[email protected]

Except when no one wants shovels anymore.

[email protected]

New York stock exchange

[email protected]

We used one to come up with a name for a feature cocktail at work. It's pretty good for that kind of stuff.

[email protected]

That's the trick, people will always want shovels. Even after the gold rush ends, the only difference is demand for shovels goes back to normal, it doesn't disappear.

[email protected]

You use it for pointers and double check the results.

[email protected]

my only hope for AGI is that it gets open sourced and is easily runnable on sub $10,000 hardware.

[email protected]

I had some files that i knew had duplicates, but didn't exactly match and whole the filenames were not identical, you could tell by looking if they were the same.

Would have been very tedious to do all of them, LLM was able to identify a "good enough" number of duplicates and only made a few mistakes. Greatly sped up the manual work required to clean up the collection.

But that's so far from most advertised scenarios and not compelling from a "make lots of money" perspective.

[email protected]

It is a shock, but at least they received their money without being left holding the bag. They have a committed backlog over a year long, they seem to be avoiding manufacturing more than they have already sold ..

[email protected]

Imagine how much more valuable alphabet stocks would be if they hadn't destroyed the core design and user experience of their search engine

Most of the current value of AI comes from the fact that Google is useless now.

argv minus one

There are (non-AI) algorithms for that. Git uses one to detect renames. No need to melt the ice caps just for that.

[email protected]

This was after applying various mechanisms of the traditional kind. Admittedly there was one domain specific strategy that want applied that would have caught a few more, but not all of them.

The point is that I had a task that was hard to code up, but trivial yet tedious for a human. AI approaches can bridge that gap sometimes.

In terms of energy consumption, it wouldn't be so bad if the approaches weren't horribly over used. That's the problem now, 99% of usage is garbage. If it settled down to like 3 or 4% of usage it would still be just as useful, but no one would bat an eye at the energy demand.

As with a lot of other bubble things, my favorite part is probably going to be it's life after the bubble pops. When the actually useful use cases remain and the stupid stuff does out.