So clever
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
A.k.a. familiars.
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
If you don’t understand my sentences, then maybe you should learn english
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
If I want to …. read your sentence, maybe, I’ll throw out all grammar and sentence structure. Maybe pretend I’ve done meth? Too!
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
You would need to know grammar and syntax if you want to do without it, wouldn’t you? How would you do that?
-
I wish I had $10 to invest at the end of the month.
-
In 2024, we call that a C level position.
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
Witches have familiars, vampires have thralls—what do they even teach in school these days? /s
-
This is always the advice given by the "experts" during retirement "workshops". Have money and invest as much as you can into broad diversified funds. That the market will always grow in the long run because it has so far is taken as almost a guarantee, yet every one of these workshops will include a disclaimer of "Past performance is not indicative of future results". At some point I feel like there's going to a massive rug pull as the rich encourage everyone to put as much money as they can into the system so the rich can use it as exit liquidity. What's even better is that with retirement accounts, you're not allowed to pull out your money until decades into the future without massive penalties, and any changes in your allocations take at least a day to be made. Meanwhile the ultrawealthy have sub-millisecond algorithms at their disposal.
I'm sure when the great rug pull happens, every genius that espoused the common advice will come out and claim that obviously it wasn't sustainable (like the tech bubble or countless other bubbles) and repeat the magic words "Past performance is not indicative of future results", then they'll all suggest some other investment vehicle and that'll become the new common knowledge advice that everyone should follow until that also becomes unsustainable.
No thanks, I'll just do the company match for a guaranteed pay amount and enjoy the rest of my money while I'm young, instead of stashing it away and hoping it doesn't get fucked with in the decades before I can draw from it penalty-free and maybe having a decent chunk of money when I'm old and less capable of enjoying it.
-
You should watch Renfield.
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
You probably should stash some away for when unexpected things happen. Unless you want to be that guy who always tries to pay expenses with credit card debt
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
I stash away quite a bit, but less in my 401k so that I have access to it whenever I want/need instead of decades into the future.
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
Good on ya. I have a colleague that's over 50 and he's broke all the time, pretty meh life situation
-
Starting with 10$
Period of 232 years 1792~2024
An average 8% of annual interest.
Ignoring any due taxes.
Rough income of 568 millions.
If only made 22m he did something very dumb in the process.
-
I wish people in my country would rather invest money than buy up properties and contribute to the housing shortage crisis
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
Classic Bram Stoker uses "familiar" as well as "What we do in the shadows".
Vampire lore fiiiight!