“be welcoming to cohost people”[looks around at the crumbling infrastructure, failed moderation tools, and the continuous refusal of new comers to understand this is not a single site, but many very different sites that are connected]
-
“be welcoming to cohost people”
[looks around at the crumbling infrastructure, failed moderation tools, and the continuous refusal of new comers to understand this is not a single site, but many very different sites that are connected]hmmm ok i’ll get my crash suit
-
Luci for dyeingreplied to Luci for dyeing last edited by
i want to say sure the more the merrier.
But i kinda decided a long while ago that the design of protocol cannot scale much beyond the number of people the network has now, without significant balkanisation;
both from a moderation point of view, but also just doing the math. O^2 growth for bandwidth per person is not good for scaling- server admins will hit a limit where they close registration or go broke
-
Luci for dyeingreplied to Luci for dyeing last edited by
already hearing some discussion about the urgency of figuring out a better engineering solution for image hosting, because N servers indefinitely holding a copy every video posted on the entire network is not suuper sustainable
-
@zens (this is a mastodon misfeature. other software pulls and caches remote media only as accessed and only for as long as configured)
-
@[email protected] if only ipfs wasn't a bit shit