So, just thinking about this Chinese AI thing and the parallels to how a Fediverse ActivityPub node can run on a $50 Rasberry Pi, but a Bluesky AT Protocol node requires a $30,000,000 supercluster.
-
replied to faraiwe last edited by
Agree that their aims are to turn it into a massive grift.
That said, there are things like astrophysics and medical research where such programming techniques will be helpful.
-
replied to Mastodon Migration last edited by
OR
we could dump what was made by people with ill intent, and develop different things, from ground up, without the contamination of #DTBO intent.
Be very very wary of those who think all problems can be solved by technology. They can not. Categorically, absolutely can not.
I have yet to see a single medical or astrophysical application of #LLM that was worth their insane consumption of resources, the social cost, and the end-state of their owners destroying democracy.
It's just the latest idiotic box that beeps and boops, for techbros to go WOO, GIMME MONEY, and fools to open wallets. Nothing else. Nothing more.
-
replied to Mastodon Migration last edited by
yes, there are others that are saying the costs could be much higher. cnbc last week claimed they have a 50k cluster of nvidia h100s. deepseek themselves claimed a couple years back that they had a 10k cluster of a100s. if any of that is true, the costs could be north of their $5.6m claim.
the interview above addresses those claims so i'm not certain what the reality is.
-
replied to Mastodon Migration last edited by
Well... There are several ways to tackle the metaphor on each side.
- As for #Bluesky: apparently, the devs are aware that using a single firehose for everything in the network is prohibitively expensive to replicate at home, so they're developing "jetstreams", which only replicate data from people you follow and only retain a certain amount of days of data. Something that would have been unnecessary, had they intended the network to be truly distributed since the beginning.
- As for #DeepSeek: looks like the US sanctions came back to bite them, as the Chinese were then forced to start optimizing with what they had. And regardless of this, while I hope the methods used by DeepSeek can be generalized to make in-house model training with properly-consented content only, I cannot trust anyone not explicitly targeting that specific scenario, otherwise I know the legal and ethical implications will not be worth the trade-off.
-
replied to Walt Baldwin last edited by
@waltbaldwin @mastodonmigration very efficient way for China to burst that AI bubble. The market already knew they were in a bubble, so at the first sign of trouble, they started dumping stock... No receipts needed.
-
replied to Mastodon Migration last edited by
It is not easy to be evil, you know.
-
-
replied to faraiwe last edited by
No argument.
-
replied to Carlos Solís last edited by [email protected]
So basically ActivityPub
-
replied to Jorge Stolfi last edited by
Evil works for a while, until it doesn't.
-
replied to Mastodon Migration last edited by
@mastodonmigration I guess that's what happens when you bake profit into every part of the system
I'm sure the Chinese system, if costs are accurate, is done at cost for political capital over amerika and not for everyone involved to make big money
-
replied to Viral Obscurity last edited by
Bingo. Being sneaky and tricky makes you vulnerable. Unfortunately sneaky and tricky is the Silicon Valley way. This may just be the tip of the iceberg.
-
replied to Viral Obscurity last edited by
@viralobscurity @mastodonmigration And success in EV's? Not everything is done for reasons of political capital. Climate change matters to China too.
China is determined to succeed and to do so despite obstacles placed in its way, because it can.
-
replied to SamuelJohnson last edited by
@samueljohnson @viralobscurity
EVs are another great example. Here we prop up super expensive monster vehicles while the rest of the world makes cool small affordable EVs. Guess which strategy wins in the long run?
-
replied to Mastodon Migration last edited by
@mastodonmigration @viralobscurity See YouTube channel of Sam Evans (@theelectricviking) for some good background on car companies, not only US ones, putting profits ahead of climate sustainability. Also good analysis on how, as result of better strategy, China now dominates battery tech and has better supply chain and software than most western auto manufacturers. Tariffs won't reverse this. EV sales will surpass ICE cars in China this year. Cheaper & better month after month.