Guess how many other fediverse devs gave kudos to Pixelfeds rise?
-
This post is deleted!
-
{Insert Pasta Pun}replied to Daniel Supernault ⁂ last edited by
@dansup ... Not sure this is a good thing to post?
-
tizmicreplied to Daniel Supernault ⁂ last edited by [email protected]
-
Shaun Wattersreplied to Daniel Supernault ⁂ last edited by
@dansup first off congrats dude. secondly I imagine that theres a huge dollop of jealous in there but its also a shitty sideeffect from the whole linux/self hosted community at large - too many superiority complexes. We`re all here for the same reasons - Why can we just play nice!
-
@dansup WhatsApp me on (317) 324-5220 if interested
-
small circle 🕊 in calmnessreplied to Daniel Supernault ⁂ last edited by
It is kinda sad and frustrating I can say fullheartedly as former multi-year facilitator of SocialHub. People like to discuss their own project, yet in general not help doing the chores to maintain a community. It gave me more nuanced idea of what a useful concept of "community" is and what not. For AS/AP fedi to work a "commons" must collaborate, consisting of many independent initiatives (who may have their own community) and also include fedizen participation in the broadest sense.
-
small circle 🕊 in calmnessreplied to small circle 🕊 in calmness last edited byThis post is deleted!
-
small circle 🕊 in calmnessreplied to small circle 🕊 in calmness last edited by
But in general, understanding the social dynamics much deeper and in hindsight, the frustration was to be expected and avoidable, realising that we cannot just project organization structures that work under hypercapitalism in the business world and think they will perform well in a commons. We need to dedicate more time figuring out how we might support this commons with the open social web technologies we build. Create the social web using social experiences based on the social web.
-
{Insert Pasta Pun}replied to small circle 🕊 in calmness last edited by
@smallcircles @dansup I definitely felt that when dropping into the metagov chat.
To be fair they are my target users (that and colleges that simulate model governments) - domain experts who are interested in digital governance and models for community organization and collective decisions
Was like "maybe I can sit back and learn from them", though I ignore most of the AI or blockchain presentations 🤮
-
small circle 🕊 in calmnessreplied to small circle 🕊 in calmness last edited by
To add. I'm deeply hurt by some recent outbursts of yours that boiled down how you only appreciate people who crank out code. And still radiate that sentiment.
I am a coder and I think "the social code" needs more than code. I might have chosen to just work on my passion and dreams. Instead I chose to invest huge amount of savings and time-of-life to try to establish environment where everyone might be able to work on dreams more easily i.e. in healthy commons.
small circle 🕊 in calmness (@[email protected])
"Show don't tell" of federate #FOSS code & apps doesn't work well in environment where we need "Show don't tell" of #OpenStandard specs to make progress. Especially if the specs are so vague that each code implementation thrown in the cauldron of #ActivityPub #fediverse installed base is known to only add #ProtocolDecay and #TechDebt. In #Commons #CommonSense makes #CommonsSense: Don't introduce the opposite of #interoperabily when in pursuit of seamless interop. We need both forms of showing.
social.coop (social.coop)
