Let's gooooooo.
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
Killed triggers the moderation and censorship tools more quickly. This way some idiot bootlicker has to "get offended" and manually report it, making it take longer for the admins to notice and take it down.
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
The 55th World Economic Forum will happen in a few weeks, but the security will probably be, like, almost twice as tight as the average school.
/s
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
My OCD wonders if they factored in having to assassinate the heirs of the CEOs and their heirs etc. until each fortune has been divvied up so many ways nobody has a billion anymore. And that would mean you advocate murdering children just because they inherited money.
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
let them keep $20 and give each of them a set of literal, *cheap* bootstraps, and let them get a *real job.*
Lettem keep hundreds of millions and all the non-lizards amongst them shouldn’t have realistic reasons to complain, plus society still benefits most hugely and you can still win capitalism (so they can’t argue completely any “necessary incentive” argument).
A lot of readers here are unimaginably wealthy compared to destitute villagers around the world, but we still prefer to have some nice things and only donate of our wealth. I’m fine extending that philosophy to anyone.
(In Burundi, the average earner won’t make $1000 this year.)
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
So were these sausages I bought today.
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
Agreed, fuck this Newspeak nonsense. People kill, fuck, shit, piss, go off half-cocked making asses of themselves, etc.
I'm all for censoring pejoratives that are inherently derogatory on the basis of sex, gender, nationality or racial characteristics, but I am deeply critical of shit like 'unaliving'. I am open to someone correcting this view, but it's something that started with large corporations afraid of their bottom line. IMO it has no place in the Fediverse.
steps off of soapbox
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
Unlike royalty the transfer of wealth isn't instant so if you work fast enough you can achieve a brief window when there are no billionaires.
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
If your lemmy instance cares about that sort of language, please join a new one. The only instances I'm aware of that care about harsh language are .ml (censors bitch and some other curses) and .world (regularly deletes stuff celebrating the UHC CEO's murder).
Otherwise, this is lemmy, you aren't on some site that cares about looking friendly and soft for advertisers. Please don't bring that self censorship shit here.
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
I don't know enough to know if it's easier to cover up months of subtle and forceful coercion, or a billionaire's murder. I think that would count as 'duress' for the nepo chilluns.
This is hard, I can understand why everyone's not doing it. -
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
Wealthy people likely have a living trust and the next trustee picks up immediately without needing time-consuming procedures like probate.
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
Not more specific I’m just correcting the inaccuracy - it’s a quote from your source I had a look around for a more specific figure too though out of interest and I’m really surprised that particular statistic isn’t easier to find given how shocking the numbers are. I’m not in the US so this subject always seems particularly mad any way you look at it.
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
People might be reluctant to assume possession of billions if people were murdering/ systematically killing billionaires. So, it might be achieved relatively quickly.
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
I love how Luigi has become a defacto symbol of the revolution. I can't imagine Nintendo being happy about it.
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
Compare the number of size S body bags used every time the cops gather to watch another “mentally troubled loner” to the average number of immediate family over 18 size of each billionaire, kids would have a trust fund guardian you’d rather capture than kill. All in all you’d probably expend a lot less ammo for more benefit going top down. Hypothetically of course.
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
Sure you can have the infinite money stone. All you have to do is make it past everyone who will suffer to power it, there’s a lot more of them than you and they are hungry
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
And I want my scalps!
-
Looks like 116 recorded school shooting related injuries this year so far. Hard to say how many of those were kids getting shot though
-
ObjectivityIncarnatereplied to [email protected] last edited by
So, who here didn't know that there are several orders of magnitude more kids than there are billionaires?
lol
-
I'd like to think that if someone from the working class would randomly get such money they would. But it still seems unlikely.
Almost all big lottery winners are working class. Look at what they do with their winnings on average, you don't need to guess.