Let's not jump to conclusions
-
That's a whole lotta words for you trying to say your not into cartoon beastiality.
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
It literally DOES start with that! That's the top level comment, word-for-word, which at least two people were too thick to understand. So yes, I gave a longer explanation, like I apparently must also provide to you.
-
It's not the same at all. A little human girl in a cartoon is still a little human girl. You show me one real mouse that looks like Mickey.
Again, is being into centaur sex being into bestiality? Or can we acknowledge the fact that fictional creatures are not the same as real ones?
People actually into bestiality help perpetuate animal cruelty. Lumping the people into anthropomorphic animal sex in cartoons into that group is really unfair and unkind to them just because you don't approve of their specific kink.
-
Yes I'd say centaur sex is beastiality. It's not a human. Drawing represent things. Just as you said a drawing of a little is still a little girl. A drawing of an animal is still an animal.
I'm not going to give anyone a pass because it's "anthropomorphic". That's a cop out.
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
You asked "Am wrong?".
The content was fine but Your post was not as clear as the top post. That's what was wrong.
-
Again- people actually into bestiality are promoting animal cruelty. These people are not. I have no idea why you can't see the difference.
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
Yes, I added shiny metaphors, explications and implications, because the subtext of the original post was apparently utterly lost on both of them.
Why use many word when few do trick? Because some people don't understand the few words.
-
That is not an effective difference, that's an excuse.
-
It can not promote animal cruelty and still be disgusting. It doesn't need to be I/0.
-
Whether or not you personally find it disgusting and whether or not it is the same as bestiality are two very different things.
This is uncomfortably close to "men who sexually assault little boys" is a subset of homosexuality. It is not.
-
Correct, but so long as people keep favoring decorum over decency, it doesn't matter.
-
The difference between the public and private spheres. There is absolutely no way to make a Nazi salute jokes in public spheres, full stop. In the private sphere I can imagine it.
-
I disagree. If someone wanks to drawings of little boys, they are a pedophile.
-
Yet again, show me a mouse that looks or even acts like Mickey. You keep avoiding the fact that what they are into are not animals, they're mythical creatures.
Until you can show some evidence that what they are actually into is real animals that actually exist then you are just doing the "pedophiles are gay" thing.
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
Fuck off. Being South African has nothing to do with this guy’s bullshit.
-
I never said pedophiles are gay. I said they are pedophiles. Whether the mouse looks like Mickey doesn't matter. If it's being sexual then it's beastiality.
Anywhoo Im done with this conversation. I will noy be responding back again.
-
He certainly made this motion to get attention, as you said, in possibly the least crafty dog whistle in recorded history.
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
Then he needs a serious anal probing by the aliens, so they can work out what the fuck is wrong with him
-
I never said pedophiles are gay. I said they are pedophiles.
Yes, that is my point.
Similarly, by this "furries are bestialists" logic, BDSM and sexual assault are the same thing. I hope you don't believe that.
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
I've also heard the excuse "he's autistic"
