On Reddit, you had the "fake internet points". On Lemmy the points are totally real, but still worthless.

Optional

I'm afraid we're fresh out of red leicester sir, it's been on order for two weeks.

Optional

remember the heated discussions about the "proper" use of downvotes?

iirc there was a bloc of users who were very adamant that downvotes only be used for indicating the comment in question failed to adhere to the 1964 Chicago Manual of Style regarding commas or something, but everybody else was using it to say "don't like it" and they were super-cheesed.

Optional

upvotes go brrrrrr

Optional

if you're using Voyager it's a setting you can change to just show upvotes.

[email protected]

Personally:

Upvote = I like it or it contributes well to discourse

Downvote = repeated trolling (first comment gets a pass, as do unpopular opinions, but doubling down on unambiguous and apolitical truths doesn't), spam, scams, etc.

[email protected]

Wait wait, global karma is a thing now…? If so: not a good change. I thought it was a great idea to omit that, tbh.

Optional

Sure, that makes sense.

[email protected]

There are also trolls who constantly say controversial things. Looking at the downvote counter tells you something.

There are also people who... I don't really know what's going in the head of a person who intentionally insult everyone they come across. Did a nefarious little brother hijack that account or is that person really trying get some achievement about maxing out the downvote counter? Some people are a complete mystery. Either way, the downvote counter serves as a red flag.

[email protected]

To me, voting is mostly a sorting tool.

I may upvote to make sure a great comment is higher than the good comments around it. I may even disagree with the comment to some extent, but I'm still going to upvote, because I think it adds something important to the conversation and more people should read it. However, there are also situations when I upvote to show my approval.

[email protected]

What if we could trade in our Internet points for some sick cosmetics

🇰 🌀 🇱 🇦 🇳 🇦 🇰 ℹ️

Honestly, that way for obtaining flair and shit would be preferable to spending actual money.

[email protected]

We all know that decorating your in-game character with cosmetics is the true endgame.

[email protected]

I've been thinking recently that Lemmy would simply be better off without any comment votes. I've heard some instances disable them, but it still seems to be the norm. Group think already has enough pull given human nature. It doesn't need a boost.

[email protected]

I mean I don’t think showing votes on posts and comments is inherently bad… but aggregating them to a user across instances seems not only technically challenging from a protocol sense (given that (de)federation and blacklisting is entirely in the control of the server admin), but also a feature that should be intentionally omitted. It’s genuinely not a useful metric in terms of building communities, which I think the lemmy stack should (and does) consider to be an essentially overriding priority.

[email protected]

I agree. At the very least they say "this many people liked what you said or posted enough to click this button", and that is far from meaningless.

[email protected]

I like vote counts on posts, because they help me understand what sort of content the community likes, and what sorts I should just not post again. But a cumulative total on my profile? I really don't care.

[email protected]

My profile already looks amazing, no need for mtx.

[email protected]

Banned, despite plenty of upvotes.

Refuse : microblogmemes

(old.lemmy.world)

Happens all the time. Anything to say @[email protected] or @[email protected]?

d00phy

Damn! I forgot all about that! Maybe cause I didn’t take it seriously because no real publisher takes the Chicago guide seriously! MLA all day every day m-fers!

d00phy

Yeah, I don’t get it either. People who take joy in the anger of others are… a different breed.