"TikTok is stealing your data."
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
It is not.
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
Because anything longer than a sentence pivoting to another argument and it all falls apart.
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
Ah ok so we should start doing the things China does then? I think them banning social media platforms is also bad when the bans are just done for the sake of monopolizing social media platforms under the control of the government. Decentralized platforms like this are a nice way around that but most people aren't gonna use them. So having platforms based in different countries to allow different perspectives on stories like with Israel/Palestine is good. Cause if we can only access American social media platforms you know they're just gonna fully suppress coverage on issues that America and various lobbying groups don't want to be talked about.
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
"TikTok is influencing you politically"
So you'll shut down Fox News, right?
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
By banning FaceBook, China is keeping itself safe from influence that could be used as a weapon to cause great and irreparable damages.
Whether I want harm to come to them is besides the point that it is a rational and logical decision.
I think the disconnect here is that you don't think they are weapons, that you don't think they will be used to commit harm.
-
[email protected]replied to /home/pineapplelover last edited by
The ban going into effect on Sunday is not the result of Donald Trump's actions but instead the 2024 HR 815 of the 118th Congress, divisions H and I.
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
Them being adversarial doesn't really matter. The allies of today are the enemies of tomorrow and the converse, so the who shouldn't matter. The problem is with anyone collecting data on your citizens because it can be sold, traded, stolen, or abused.
If it was about protecting people, a wide-spread countermeasure would be used instead of a pinpointed assault targeting a single app.
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
OR SOLD TO A US BASED BUYER (I'm personally thinking this is the Muskrat's doing, but that's all conspiracy)
If true, Musk may have bought shares in companies that deal with data and wants to simply profit. I have had a work colleague who got rich buying stocks and is bit of a fan of Elon Musk. He admits that private data is basically the new gold but the masses is all too unaware or uncaring for it. So you might be on to something with this.
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
I choose to believe a hostile foreign dictatorship means more harm than a hostile domestic for profit business.
Probably because that aligns with what each of them says they want, to say nothing of their actions.
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
Top part opinion the rest is the wording of the law you quoted. Want to point out if it has fangs or any actual good legislation or just say they did a thing?
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
According to this statista article at least 80% of their population has mobile phones with internet access as of 2023. So I'm not sure exactly what you're talking about here.
-
I think Trump is going to try to work out a deal where TickTok gets to stay the way it is if the company publicly blames Democrats for all the noise.
-
archomrade [he/him]replied to [email protected] last edited by
A massive, comprehensive data privacy law would've covered the TikTok base and any software by any other threat
That's assuming the ban is motivated by privacy reasons, but i don't think it is. It's far more likely that it's because the US has no control over the platform's algorithm, which they fear is feeding Americans media and perspectives that are antithetical to their foreign policy objectives (Blinken and Romney have both stated as much).
A US buyer would be more friendly/responsive to US regulatory influence. That's the only reason this isn't a privacy bill instead of a ban or forced sale.
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
Facebook too.
Don't forget Cambridge Analytica -
I don’t think I see pro-TikTok memes, but rather “why stop at TikTok” memes
-
The hive is (or at least was) a bit split. Many users seem to hate TikTok because they just dislike it for whatever reason (e.g., addictive short form videos), but others view this as a fascist move by the US or anti-China.
-
Data privacy is so much more than "selling data to China, Russia, Iran, and North Korea." What a weak rebuttal.
-
So nothing short of a complete ban of all social media and advertising is Data Privacy to you, then?
-
just look at the number of pro TikTok memes being shared right now, there's something fishy happening.
If by "fishy" you mean "the ban is going into effect so people are expressing frustration", sure.