POV: It's January 19th
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
Actually fight against that rather than pretending too, Israel and Russia have destroyed the US from within far more than China... Maybe tackle the active objective threats rather than potential ones
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
Women were not specifically barred from voting in the United Kingdom until the Great Reform Act of 1832. This doesn’t mean that they voted often - and would have been practically barred in most circumstances, but it was possible in some. There were no bars on suffrage for black men in the United Kingdom at any point.
If we talk about representative power, we can talk about how the balance of power in Congress was unfairly weighed in favor of southern states through things such as the 2/3 Compromise (having large, non voting enslaved population.) There was no direct voting on Senate positions until a later amendment which I’m too stoned to bother looking up right now. Even if your ideal of democracy is the Athens of direct democracy - one man one vote - I don’t think the 18th century US was that spectacular.
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
Lol, fair play, I editorialized the titles too. But really once you click into them it's super obvious these guys have an axe to grind. For example, (from the relevant paper) they state that serving up less Anti CCP content is a bias. But they compare it to YouTube and Instagram. Two services pretty famous for taking people down far right tracks if you let their algorithm auto play. So in this case even a neutral position is going to have less Anti-CCP propaganda.
And the entire paper is flawed in this way. The baseline they establish is itself flawed. They also claim causation but can only show correlation with their skewed baseline.
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
Women were not specifically barred from voting in the United Kingdom until the Great Reform Act of 1832. This doesn’t mean that they voted often - and would have been practically barred in most circumstances, but it was possible in some. There were no bars on suffrage for black men in the United Kingdom at any point.
Before the reform act of 1832, something like 1% of the population of the UK could vote due to property requirements, stricter than any of the US states in the 1790s.
-
You actually mixed up a couple characters, it's *******
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
Well, if Wikipedia is wrong for you, then ok, I guess?
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
Maybe it's more of your propaganda?
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
They already knew they could control zuckyboy though.
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
But the US isn’t a democracy. It’s a republic.
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
As someone who dropped TikTok around 3 years ago, the next month or two are going to be very amusing.
-
[email protected]replied to Count Regal Inkwell last edited by
banned the use of vpns to get to foreign sites which even China doesn't do
What are you talking about? The GFC tries its absolute best to block VPNs and other circumvention methods.
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
A republic is a kind of democracy.
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
You should actually read that article and not just the title. What happened there was entirely political.
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
And one naturally says the reason why we are in such a mess is not simply that we have wrong systems for doing things—whether they be technological, political, or religious—but we have the wrong people. The systems may be alright, but they are in the wrong hands, because we are all in various ways self-seeking, lacking in wisdom, lacking in courage, afraid of death, afraid of pain, unwilling really to cooperate with others, unwilling to be open to others.
—Alan Watts, Mind Over Mind
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
Because democracy is an abstract name for a system and republic is the more concrete result of that system, democracy is frequently used when the emphasis is on the system itself. We could say that democracy is to republicas monarchy is to kingdom.
Democracy or Republic: What's the difference?
The words democracy and republic are frequently used to mean the same thing: a government in which the people vote for their leaders. However, there are some situations in which one is better to use than the other.
(www.merriam-webster.com)
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
Because democracy is an abstract name for a system and republic is the more concrete result of that system
In other words, a republic is a kind of democracy.
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
That capitalism baby! I suppose Congress can at least control who Facebook et al. are selling to through sanctions and such.
-
ERROR: Earth.exe has crashedreplied to [email protected] last edited by
A republic you say?
Republic just means a country without monarchy.
China is a Republic
North Korea is a Republic
The US is a Democratic Republic
Where do you think the name of the political party "Democratic-Republicans" come from?
-
[email protected]replied to Count Regal Inkwell last edited by
when exactly did that happen
-
ERROR: Earth.exe has crashedreplied to [email protected] last edited by
Hybrid Regime with democratic features