AI needs to stop

[email protected]

Then they may as well say they did it "with computers."
Oh, but that's not sexy, is it.

[email protected]

Cars and airplanes do have 3D printed parts. They're much more common in the prototyping phase, but they are used in production and are making their way to space.

I completely agree with your general sentiment though. Any time a new piece of technology shows promise there are a ton of people who will loudly proclame that it will completely replace <old and busted technology> in <a massive amount of areas> while turning a blind eye to things like scaling and/or practical limitations.

See also: low/no code, which has roots going back to the 1980s at least.

[email protected]

No lie, I actually really love the concept of Microsoft Recall, I've got the adhd and am always trying to retrace my steps to figure out problems i solved months ago. The problem is for as useful as it might be it's just an attack surface.

[email protected]

I mean, no, it isn't. It is a marketing decision after all.
That doesn't mean that type of thing isn't the product of AI research.

[email protected]

What's wrong with containers?

[email protected]

CEOs get FOMO. They can get funding for their companies if they share "new, exciting innovations" for their products and AI is that - even if it's forcefeed in fit.

[email protected]

Not sure about that hot take. Containers are here for the long run.

[email protected]

Rule 34 clearly states everything must fuck everything. No exceptions. AI will be forced into fucking everything!

[email protected]

One of my favorite examples is "smart paste". Got separate address information fields? (City, state, zip etc) Have the user copy the full address, clock "Smart paste", feed the clipboard to an LLM with a prompt to transform it into the data your form needs. Absolutely game-changing imho.

Or data ingestion from email - many of my customers get emails from their customers that have instructions in them that someone at the company has to convert into form fields in the app. Instead, we provide an email address (some-company-inbound@ myapp.domain) and we feed the incoming emails into an LLM, ask it to extract any details it can (number of copies, post process, page numbers, etc) and have that auto fill into fields for the customer to review before approving the incoming details.

So many incredibly powerful use-cases and folks are doing wasteful and pointless things with them.

[email protected]

It literally makes my job easier. Why would I hate it LMAO

[email protected]

Forcing AI into everything maximizes efficiency, automates repetitive tasks, and unlocks insights from vast data sets that humans can't process as effectively. It enhances personalization in services, driving innovation and improving user experiences across industries. However, thoughtful integration is critical to avoid ethical pitfalls, maintain human oversight, and ensure meaningful, responsible use of AI.

[email protected]

Actually ️ rule 34 indicates that porn of it exists, but not which type of porn. It could be solo content

[email protected]

I think the complaint is that apps are being designed with containerization in mind when they don't need it

Zement

My thermostat hides no brainier features behind an "Ai" subscription. Switching off the heating when the weather will be warm that day doesn't need Ai... that's not even machine learning, that's a simple PID controller.

[email protected]

Interesting, I definitely see where his mind is at with that offer, and how it was easily misunderstood

[email protected]

I'm so glad I switched to just home assistant and zigbee devices, and my radiators are dumb, so I could replace them with zigbee ones. Fuck making everything "smart" a subscription

[email protected]

Objection! Your statement is devastating to my case!

[email protected]

Copyright is actually very important, especially to independent authors, photographers, digital artists, traditional artists, videographers (YouTubers as an example), and especially movie producers. Copyright protects their work from being taken by someone else and claimed as their own, however special cases do exist where other individuals are allowed to use copywritten material that is not theirs, this is where fair use comes into play. If we did not have fair use, but still had Copyright, the large majority of YouTube videos would be illegal, from commentary videos to silly meme videos. So calling Copyright a cancer is like wanting their work to be out in a field of monkeys and hope they don't notice it, spoiler, they always do.

[email protected]

Did you need help with your case

[email protected]

Docker: