the amount of slop saying "wait till the end" is too damn high

[email protected]

They do this because it works on many people.

[email protected]

If you watch the first hour of this slop you'll be numb and enjoy the next 5 hours.

[email protected]

create account
use AI or automated process to post tons of slop videos
stupid people like, comment or share the video
account's engagement goes up
now transition it into advertising
sell it to a company. "Look, this account has 100k followers. How's $10,000 sound?"

[email protected]

it's so easy to create these types of accounts and flood them with low-effort AI slop that blocking one or two accounts never did it for me. regardless of the platform (tiktok, facebook, instagram, any other social media, including some of your revered FOSS platforms) it's easy to bypass humanity filters with very little effort and fill the account with garbage. all of these platforms behave the same way: if outside accounts engage with it, it becomes more valuable. that's why there are so many of these, and why "just banning" a few of them won't solve it

Miles O'Brien

Step 1: block archiebot

Step 2: enjoy about 75% reduced spam

[email protected]

I'm a simple man, I see TikTok I dislike.

[email protected]

I can count on one hand the number of videos I've seen where "wait until the end" holds true.

The most recent in years is a video of a dog chewing on something. The owner approaches it and the dog lets go of a hose which then sprays the owner.

Was not expecting that.

Lad

This Man Took A Normal Photo Of His Wife But Realised Something Was Very Wrong

Answer In Link Below

TLDR(after clicking through 21 slides that each load a new website): She had a benign mole on her shoulder.

[email protected]

Good thing it doesn't work here.

But it's a known way to make money on the other site.

[email protected]

As it should be

[email protected]

It says something of the Tik-tok generations attention span if you need to put a "wait till the end" reminder for a 10 second video.

Btw if I see this anywhere its an instant downvote/skip.

[email protected]

I hate the fuckheads who overlay themselves front-and-center over another video to repeatedly point at whatever they want you to observe while steadily breathing through their mouth.

It's even worse when they first point to their ear and then their eye to say, "LISHEN 'n LOOKSH, bruh.."

[email protected]

because there's only a few thousand users here.

that's why it isn't commonplace; there's no money in it. slop companies make more money on tiktok, facebook and other popular platforms...

...but Lemmy is not free from abuse of this type. If the fediverse was more popular it would start to see more slop content.

that's my point. it does work here, because the same vulnerabilities exist, but isn't common because it's not as profitable as shitting in tiktok or facebook.

[email protected]

True, but that third panel kinda looks like one of those videos where they make their kitty pop and lock and those are kind of adorable.

[email protected]

A man took a nor

m

a

[Large Ad]

[Can't tell if this is a piece of a new article or a continuation of the current one]

Man was take picture of lady and wowzah did he see

[Another Ad]

[Large Scrolling Ad]

something on her that was crazy

and he look at picture closely t

o

get a be

t

er

[Huge Ad that Breaks the Page's Format]

[Small Ad]

Celebrity Colin Ferral was seen today with ex-wife while wearing a brown coat

[Large Ad]

Continue reading here

[email protected]

No, the same vulnerability does not exist here.

There are different vulnerabilities here, but this one isn't there.

[email protected]

Usually tiktok is the most responsive feed out of all the platforms if you scroll away from some specific content asap. It will not try to push it again and again.

[email protected]

It says the same thing "Don't touch that dial!" said about your generation. Which is nothing: the advertiser is admitting what follows is uninteresting.

[email protected]

Your position is that Lemmy is immune to the following: company creates an account on Lemmy, spams communities with low effort content (possibly created by AI or automated processes), attracts viewers, then sells the account to another company as part of an advertising campaign. This position can be defeated if the above happens even one time. I'm refusing to debate you on this not because you're infallibly correct, but because it's not worth the investment of time. Any idiot can see it's an indefensible position. Have a day. 🫱