Krampus
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
poor landlords. they should just sell.
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
The beauty of this is you'd be able to afford all of these if wages and housing costs were reasonable. The rich are the cause of both issues.
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
In that example, yes it would.
I don't agree with your premise. When Tesco had more cart stations, I used them. I use them in Asda because they aren't far from the car, but when they remove stations to cut jobs, they are the ones being rude.
I'm not in the US. We never had gas station attendants. I guess fuel theft was never the same issue here as in the States.
It's very hard to use bank tellers. Many branches got shut down. It was never really a thing in my lifetime.
It's very easy to accept situations when you don't see it change. You accept it as fact. Young folk just accept you don't have data privacy because it never really existed in their life time.
Supermarkets automate things or put the work onto customers not to pass those savings on to customers, but to increase their margins at the cost of peoples jobs. Some folk are just fine with that.
Many would welcome automation if the gains and benefits were shared around. But it isn't. The rich get richer and the unemployment line grows. The media train folk to hate the unemployed, like it was their choice their job was removed.
If the only way to keep a fairer wealth distribribution is to keep folk in jobs, so be it. We don't have basic income or a 4 day week yet.
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
Firstly, it isn't a few meters. Secondly, I think the term is disabled but hey, name calling isn't a new thing.
I'm not in the USA BTW.
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
Not where you work.
You also failed to answer any of my points. If the head count is 0.25 per hour rather than 0.75, they'll combine rolls and cut a head count. If 2 roles require 0.75, then they need 1.5 staff and need to round up, if it's 1.1, they round down and a headcount gone. The shift will be run with 70 staff rather than 71.
How can you work in the role and not know how it works?
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
How can you work in the role and not know how it works?
Oh hey look they can't read, either! No wonder their arguments are so piss poor
-
Are you a good person or just incapable of thinking for yourself? Because they look a lot alike.
It's something to think about.
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
That's true, the rich truly are the issue largely.
My good landlord(s) aren't though and they were never what I would consider rich. Just doing slightly better than me at the time. And I got to benefit from their slightly above me income bracket. I think it's easier in smaller towns and cities than the big places like Vancouver Toronto and such though. The housing costs and rental costs are insane there. Go to places like Thunder Bay and it's a lot more affordable. -
Is that what we call a joint venture?
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
There are honest people out there. Unfortunately, it's a drip of water in the ocean.