Guns

[email protected]

I would trust an officer over Ultragagginggunnut any day of the week.

False dichotomy. Those aren't the only choices.

In your entire comment, you failed to realize that "Doomsider" is a perfectly viable option.

With "Doomsider" being an option for you, "officer" should be considered a distant second.

[email protected]

It's a reference to the movie Dirty Harry

[email protected]

When you actually want to respond to what I said I will be waiting.

[email protected]

Certainly. Thank you for your patience, and for the opportunity for discussion.

I respectfully and summarily reject the underlying premise of what you were saying. Your comment did not consider that you are the person best capable of providing your own "protection".

I submit that the regulatory environment needs to recognize and respect that fact.

[email protected]

Still waiting

[email protected]

This made me laugh. You sound like Philomena Cunk!

[email protected]

I have traveled most of the country and 95% of Americans are normal people who just want the best for the people around them. They just have different perspectives on what that means.

You should let your hate go, my friend. I promise you’ll be happier for it.

[email protected]

What are you waiting for? I have responded twice before this comment. Your comment is premised on a false dichotomy. When we eliminate that premise, the remainder of your comment doesn't make much sense.

One route forward: You could support your position on a different premise. Another route: You could abandon your previous position and adopt a new one. I eagerly await your choice.

[email protected]

Same and is clear 95% are not gun nutters.

Reality is a harsh mistress and your gun rhetoric is absolute garbage.

[email protected]

Nice try, let me turn on my Rivalarrival translator: Ah yes it is coming in clear now. You did not like what I said but you have no rebuttal so you hyper focused on one thing. You invented a false premise and remembered to project that like any good bullshitter.

Still waiting.

[email protected]

That does make it better!

[email protected]

I dont see a problem with owning guns. Its just taken too lightly in the states. To get a gun where im at, you need to get certified - theoretical, physical and psychological tests are done. And no one starts pissing about personal freedoms if they fail these tests. I think you also need to be member of a shooting club. Point is, you need to demonstrate your ability to handle a weapon responsibly. Im not one to confuse correlation with causation but... you dont see many stories of shootings here.

[email protected]

I'm sorry you feel that way, but none of what you're saying in any way addresses my point: your argument is fundamentally based on the aforementioned false dichotomy. You are the most reliable protector of you. Nobody has a greater motivation to protect you than you. Regulation should recognize that fact.

I understand it may seem like I am "hyper focused" on this rebuttal to your argument, but that is only because you have asked for further response, without actually addressing my initial argument. You've presented no new arguments for me to consider.

Pavel Chichikov

How about you just give them guns so they can shoot the acid attackers. Turns out, you don't need much training with a gun. Point shoot. Very simple. Point shoot. School shooters figure it out just fine.

[email protected]

Most reliable protector? What kind of word salad AI bullshit are you trying to feed me.

Still waiting.

[email protected]

I utilized conjugations of your own words:

You are seriously arguing that the corruption in our police system means there is no protection? This is objectively false.I would trust an officer over Ultragagginggunnut any day of the week.

(Emphasis mine)

You identified two possible "protectors". Your argument failed to consider yourself as a third option. That oversight is a fundamental flaw in your initial argument.

You are not a "prisoner". You are the person in the best position to protect you. That fact is not represented in your initial argument.

[email protected]

I think we are done here. You are clearly just generating AI garbage.

Not waiting anymore.

[email protected]

It's been a pleasure. My hope is that in future arguments, you will remember your own agency and empowerment.

[email protected]

Actually Sudden Impact same actor tho https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xy-eMIXT4LM

[email protected]

*When anyone does it.

The solution to there being too many guns is to remove the guns. Not add more.