This is infininitivelivy worse
-
[email protected]replied to JackFrostNCola last edited by
You know, just for you: I just changed it to the Coca Cola santa
-
NιƙƙιDιɱҽʂreplied to [email protected] last edited by
Wait, when did you do this? I just tried this for my town and researched each aspect to confirm myself. It was all correct. It talked about the natives that once lived here, how the land was taken by Mexico, then granted to some dude in the 1800s. The local attractions were spot on and things I've never heard of. I'm...I'm actually shocked and I just learned a bunch of actual history I had no idea of in my town 🤯
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
Spreading the holly day spirit
-
JackFrostNColareplied to [email protected] last edited by
We are all dutch on this blessed day
-
-
[email protected]replied to JackFrostNCola last edited by
We are all gekoloniseerd
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
ChatGPT is a tool under development and it will definitely improve in the long term. There is no reason to shit on it like that.
Instead, focus on the real problems: AI not being open-source, AI being under the control of a few monopolies, and there being little to none regulations that ensure it develops in a healthy direction.
-
[email protected]replied to NιƙƙιDιɱҽʂ last edited by
I did that test late last year, and repeated it with another town this summer to see if it had improved. Granted, it made less mistakes - but still very annoying ones. Like placing a tourist info at a completely incorrect, non-existent address.
I assume your result also depends a bit on what town you try. I doubt it has really been trained with information pertaining to a city of 160.000 inhabitants in the Netherlands. It should do better with the US I’d imagine.
The problem is it doesn’t tell you it has knowledge gaps like that. Instead, it chooses to be confidently incorrect.
-
it will definitely improve in the long term.
Citation needed
There is no reason to shit on it like that.
Right now there is, because of how wrong it and other AIs can be, with the average person using the first answer as correct without double checking
-
NιƙƙιDιɱҽʂreplied to [email protected] last edited by
Only 85k pop here, but yeah. I imagine it's half YMMV, half straight up luck that the model doesn't hallucinate shit.
-
AI is pretty over-rated but the Anti-AI forces way overblow the problems associated with AI.