Moral dilemas (SMBC)

[kolanaki@yiffit.net]

Then there is no problem. I get what I want, people who need bread get what they want. Everyone wins!*

^*Well, not the baker.^

[etterra@discuss.online]

A baker ≠ a rich CEO.

The baker works for a living, if nothing else.

[gladiusb@lemmy.world]

I beg to argue they organize the middle managers. Everyone answers to someone.

[el_guapazo@lemmy.world]

Sounds like a hell yeah to me

[soup@lemmy.world]

What are you talking about? “Ergmahgerd they like Starbucks” seriously can you hear yourself? Like what does Starbucks coffee and having online subscriptions have to do with someone’s ability to learn?

Touch grass.

[zeffsyde@lemmy.world]

The Baker provides a service for a fee, the CEO denies service to inflate wealth (at least the ones that should be worrying).

[acockworkorange@mander.xyz]

But you haven’t maximized evil as was required. Are you even paying attention in class, Kolanaki?

[cataphract@lemmy.ml]

eh, I put plenty of "or" statements in there. If you proclaim knowledge and then exclaim an ignorant claim, I'm just musing on your assuming tirade.

There is such a thing as Culinary School, you see?

[sam_bass@lemmy.world]

The culinary schooling I got was my grandma

[orrk@lemmy.world]

that's the fun part, they actually don't, most middle managers are the controlling instance already, and any case where they aren't is because the corporate structure has multiple upper level management layers further reducing contact to the CEO