POV: It's January 19th
-
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
So can you answer the question now that we know it's China? Why is it worse that China has user info over the US?
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
I think tiktok should be banned for its addictive algorithm. It is far worse than any other social media for that reason.
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
It probably won't make a difference for you, but if you worked in a government facility and they're spying on you, obtaining credentials, obtaining information on infrastructure in the energy sector, government facilities, etc., getting network credentials, getting floorplans, getting times where a changing of the guard occurs, etc. - any foreign entity can use that info to tear a country down from the inside and kick off a full scale war.
Local government isn't going to self-saborage with that information. Yeah, spying on the citizens is awful and we should avoid any apps/devices that do that too, but that's not as bad as war unless it gets so bad that it gets to a point of civil war which seems unlikely.
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
we are in that country right now
Links wiki article to anti-communist measures taken in 1954
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
Uhh. The user is saying that the US government has a long history of both corruption and abuse of power.
Source: I am American. -
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
Yes, now they just need the incentive to act and the knowledge of how to operate electronic devices.
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
That's true but it doesn't apply to the vast majority of people. People who work in the government should be more aware of these things and I believe the tiktok ban started as only on government devices which is a lot more reasonable than a blanket ban.
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
They're owned by a Chinese company so the Chinese govt has this information. I'm not saying it's a good reason to ban it, or that there isn't another secret reason, or that American companies don't gather the same information. This was the problem all along - China receiving vast amounts of information about Americans. Actually the US was probably worried about China spreading their viewpoints, now that I think more about it. IDK
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
As an adult, that's my choice to make, not the government.
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
Aren't they a 49:51 split international company:Chinese version?
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
I thought it was because they wanted to be in charge of what was censored and what wasn't and was left able to be seen and shared amongst users.
Also, what Chinese Facebook? Xiaohong Shu or DaZhong DianPing are probably closest... But still way off.
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
Or ever, unless you go there.
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
You can't have your "we're better than them cos freedumb" cake and eat it too.
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
Yeah, Google's tracking is way more pervasive and far less optional.
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
You should probably ready the wiki article on whataboutism, so that you understand how to use it correctly next time.
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
It means your facts hurt their feels.
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
As long as the Chinese entity has control, it's fair game.
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
Well, let's set the bar at not having concentration camps or not going to jail or being made "dissappear" for criticizing the government. For now...
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
Yes, but also note that it hasn't been recinded, and our current Supreme Court has a soft spot for digging up forgotten legislation.