the amount of slop saying "wait till the end" is too damn high

[email protected]

dont forget to getting redirected to a suspicious page bcuz u missed the close button by 1 pixel

[email protected]

Subscribed

[email protected]

Lmao it's because people attention spans are literally like 2 seconds.

Shits sad

[email protected]

What about the people who are worried about the harmful mental and physical effects that TikTok has on people? The privacy concerned trying to keep their data safe? What about empty and repetitive content? TikTok is a wormhole of negative behavior, and as much as there can be interesting content on the platform the majority is overhyped and recycled garbage(independent of your interests). If the platform was not a massive conveyor belt feeding empty content for the sake of money I would be somewhat ok with it. I've tried TikTok, Vine and even Snapchat and personally it is quite fun doing short video content(informative, silly or otherwise) but I do not enjoy being treated as a pig to be fed.

[email protected]

My thoughts exactly

[email protected]

It's more so that the uploader gets the most watch time and engagement and therefore the biggest paycheck per video.

BTW, down voting is seen as engagement and prioritized just the same as up voting. Doesn't matter which button you're pushing as long as it's on the platform.

[email protected]

Nah, it's because it's never anything worth watching. If you have to tell people to wait until the end, it's because there's nothing in that first 55 seconds worth seeing.

There's good short-form content
out
there, and none of it begs you not to swipe away

[email protected]

Surely you aren't talking about Game Changer, the best game show, the reason Dropout is worth paying for

Amber Rose🌹

New trends

[email protected]

I've heard this law mentioned before, but interestingly in that same Wikipedia article there are several studies mentioned that seemed to conclude it's not true at all:

A 2016 study of a sample of academic journals (not news publications) that set out to test Betteridge's law and Hinchliffe's rule (see below) found that few titles were posed as questions and of those that were questions, few were yes/no questions and they were more often answered "yes" in the body of the article rather than "no".

A 2018 study of 2,585 articles in four academic journals in the field of ecology similarly found that very few titles were posed as questions at all, with 1.82 percent being wh-questions and 2.15 percent being yes/no questions. Of the yes/no questions, 44 percent were answered "yes", 34 percent "maybe", and only 22 percent were answered "no".

In 2015, a study of 26,000 articles from 13 news sites on the World Wide Web, conducted by a data scientist and published on his blog, found that the majority (54 percent) were yes/no questions, which divided into 20 percent "yes" answers, 17 percent "no" answers and 16 percent whose answers he could not determine.

[email protected]

I have blocked at least one "videos" community, since I have no interest in watching anything masquerading as informative. I've been on Lemmy a bunch lately, so I can only assume that I've pre-emptively blocked the instance or community where it's being posted.

JackbyDev

Every time I've seen people use this the thing that happens at the end should've been the entire video and/or wasn't even funny/worth watching.

lurch (he/him)

AWS or Azure?

ZeroOne

When a "Shorts" starts with Watch Till the end for "X" & spouts a big load of Bull throughout the start, yeah it's Clickbait

[email protected]

Short form video and its consequences have been a disaster for the human race.

[email protected]

And the constant lamenting on how we're behind the syllabus and how we need to move on, like it's a race and not an educational process.

[email protected]

Oh yeah, im no stranger to blocking users and entire communities on this platform….there’s just usually the initial wave of whatever the new spam is until i can get my feed cleaned up again.

[email protected]

Lol my mind went straight to thinking this was some type of apocalypse trend.

[email protected]

No, I understood perfectly.
Capitalism causes apps to be shitty
But you don't understand that capitalism isn't the only reason that apps become shitty.

And out comes the big "algorithm" Boogeyman, decried by people who don't know what an algorithm is.

You know why it's easy to put down Lemmy? Because it does a horrifically shitty job at presenting you with new content that you're actually interested in. That it. That's the entire story. You're less addicted because it's less enjoyable. That is literally the entire thing.

Lemmy has all the parts needed for the same experience: an infinitely scrolling list of bite sized content. The only difference is that there is way less content here, and there is no discovery (meaning it keeps you in your own self-defined echo chamber).
Lemmy is a reddit clone, and if you're gonna tell me that people aren't addicted to reddit at similarly "dangerous" rates then I'ma full on call you a liar with my entire full chest.