I really can't stay...

[marcos@lemmy.world]

Very scary code!

[criss_cross@lemmy.world]

But that's HTML....

[lordamplifier@pawb.social]

Looks like there's a cookie banner in there. The "Options" button is probably hard to find because it's only a slightly different shade of the background colour, and you'll have to manually uncheck twenty "legitimate interest" boxes hidden in a submenu. Pretty scary, indeed!

[rain_worl@lemmy.world]

with javascript

[egrets@lemmy.world]

This is dumb and I love it.

[wise_pancake@lemmy.ca]

I hate that those all use those damn switches instead of the default checkbox UI.

There’s no clear on or off state with the switches. They’re not accessible at all. They require extra code instead of a few lines of CSS and zero JavaScript.

They’re a scourge.

[synapse1278@lemmy.world]

Windows code, gross.

[fiery@lemmy.dbzer0.com]

20? I've seen 200+

[ephera@lemmy.ml]

HTML is code (it's a way of encoding information). It's just not typically seen as a programming language.

[majormajormajormajor@lemmy.ca]

Ur dumb and I love u

[gregor@gregtech.eu]

This code seems a bit chaotic

[timesquirrel@kbin.melroy.org]

Wat? It's the JS source for some website. Whoever made this literally just clicked "view page source" on a random website. It's OS agnostic.

[aeronmelon@lemmy.world]

The pull requests are really coming down!

[ephera@lemmy.ml]

It's 'minified', in case you're not familiar with that. Basically, many webpages come with such obscene amounts of JavaScript, that it genuinely impacts how quickly the webpage downloads. And then replacing such amenities as whitespace or readable variable names with just 1 space or 1 letter, where possible, genuinely improves on that.

[kautau@lemmy.world]

Unless the joke was “windows code” as in, he’s pointing to the window and that’s where the code is