see the problem with putting boobs in the content warning is that i have this weird pet peeve.
-
see the problem with putting boobs in the content warning is that i have this weird pet peeve. I hate when people use a word once and put it in the content warning. So for me to say "boobs" and then talk about transfems showing their peers pictures of their breast development as a platonic thing. How do I explain that? Like, people who are curious about the effects of hrt, it's fascinating how effective it can be. Like, sometimes you just need someone to show it off to because you're proud of them?
-
so this is why i am being weird about "genitals" because it's not like they're flashing their groin it's a consensual like "Hey look, they're growing isn't that cool" it's not like a guy sending you an unsolicited picture of his junk
-
@puppygirlhornypost2 Is talking about boobs something that even needs a CW?
-
@[email protected] this is what i am thinking about
-
@[email protected] if i were talking about them in a sexual context, i'd say yes. cw that. there's people on here at work. I just, the post wasn't sexual. I don't want to reinforce that belief of "boobs are sex objects" right like, a woman can breastfeed a child and that's them nurturing that's not indecent exposure that's not sexual. i don't want to contribute to women around me thinking their boobs are something that needs to be hidden from the world
-
@puppygirlhornypost2 "non-sexual/medical/anatomic research/whatever nudity"?
-
@puppygirlhornypost2 or just be like english wikipedia and have it as is :02shrug: doubt anyone's going to have a traumatic response to breasts lol
-
@[email protected] BIG, SQUEEZABLE BREASTS KILLED MY GRANDMA OKAY?
