As I wrote last week: "As other information sources fall, Wikipedia’s stubborn independence becomes more vital than ever.
-
Donating to the Wikimedia Foundation is great. Becoming a volunteer editor is even better.
-
Molly Whitereplied to Molly White last edited by [email protected]
Here are resources for maintaining your personal security as an editor:
* https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Personal_security_practices
* https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia_Foundation/Legal/Community_Resilience_and_Sustainability/Human_Rights/Digital_Security_ResourcesI publicly connect my Wikipedia account to my IRL identity, but this is NOT required.
-
T [email protected] shared this topic
-
B [email protected] shared this topic
-
@molly0xfff I'm less concerned about personal security and more about people who single mindedly enforce policy like "this is the right way of tagging a photo you took and uploaded 15 years ago, change the tags or we'll delete the photo!"
Like, relax, it's a photo of a bus. Whatever free use copy tag is in fashion now, just tell me what it is to apply it I don't want to sift through a long WP:policy treatise to figure it out
-
@krupo last I recall, Commons defaults to CC BY 4.0
-
Wikipedia's Tor/proxy blocking policy is an unfortunate impediment to aspiring editors wanting to maintain personal security
The value of Tor and anonymous contributions to Wikipedia | Tor Project
According to a recently published research paper co-authored by researchers from Drexel, NYU, and the University of Washington, Tor users make high-quality contributions to Wikipedia. And, when they are blocked, as doctoral candidate Chau Tran, the lead author describes, "the collateral damage in the form of unrealized valuable contributions from anonymity seekers is invisible."
(blog.torproject.org)
-
@adamsaidsomething it is. it is a very challenging predicament
-
@molly0xfff It surprises me that that page doesn't talk about logging IPs through links, which is one of the more credible threats floated by Heritage in those slides. Yes, I know, SOFIXIT, but I know much more about losing anonymity than maintaining it; maybe someone else would like to add something on it though.
-
@tamzin yeah, I had the same thought. maybe I'll SOFIXIT tomorrow
-
S [email protected] shared this topic
-
U [email protected] shared this topic
-
M [email protected] shared this topic
-
@molly0xfff @adamsaidsomething
Otherwise allowing Tor would open the door for trolls and makes it even easier for propagandists.
Tough choice. -
Stone Bear :HeartGenderqueer:replied to Molly White last edited by
@molly0xfff @adamsaidsomething Do they block ordinary garden-variety VPNs too? or is it _just Tor_? (I know how to go find out myself but first I'd have to go recover my wikipedia account; I haven't edited in years...) b/c there are VPNs that I trust way more than Tor...
-
M [email protected] shared this topic
-
@molly0xfff Spicy take: more folks would become editors if they didn't have good reason to believe right wing activists and deletion warriors would show up and delete their work and be treated as legitimate rather than vandals.
-
@symphonikus @molly0xfff @adamsaidsomething Just allow only logged in edits thru Tor not anonymous.
-
Molly Whitereplied to Stone Bear :HeartGenderqueer: last edited by
@stonebear @adamsaidsomething VPNs are also widely blocked
-
@dalias that's certainly one of the goals of projects like the Heritage Foundation's
-
@dalias @symphonikus @adamsaidsomething just shifts the problem
-
E [email protected] shared this topic
-
T [email protected] shared this topic
