our most prescriptivist opinion is that "assless chaps" is redundant because if they had an ass theyd be pants

[atax1a@infosec.exchange]

our most prescriptivist opinion is that "assless chaps" is redundant because if they had an ass theyd be pants

[atax1a@infosec.exchange]

also: there aren't assed chaps

[trysdyn@electric.marf.space]

@atax1a If I haphazardly stitched a pair together that didn't fit right and would fall apart in a day, would they be half-assed chaps?

[atax1a@infosec.exchange]

@trysdyn yes but that's an entirely different kettle of corn

[joe_no_body@mastodon.social]

@atax1a alternatively: chaps are only assless if they aren't being worn. if they are being worn, they're assful chaps

[atax1a@infosec.exchange]

@joe_no_body assy chaps