Okay, sure, let's do this. "nomadic identity" 1. No one has ever even come close to explaining how using a did: uri is supposed to work2. Even assuming it works, no one can explain how it's different than oidc3. Even assuming it was different, what hap...

Mike Macgirvin 🖥️

a did:uri is a string that represents you. It is not tied to  DNS, so it can represent you at any server. Now the truth is the web is DNS based so we have to resolve it to a location to find you. This requires a DNS operation of some kind. But the location is not actually you. It's just where you're hanging out today. You can move. Your id is the same.

OIDC is an authentication and authorisation framework. DID is just an identity. Proving it's your identity requires you to sign something.

Finding the responsible adult you  mention is just a slightly different algorithm. You can forget about the location. It is only relevant for knowing somewhere to look for the identity. But you're looking for the identity. In practice this means you won't have just 'user' storage. You'll have user (identity) storage and location storage, and it isn't necessarily a 1:1 mapping. You can have several locations for a given identity. For traditional fediverse accounts, there will be a 1:1 mapping.

If you want to  block a person, blocking locations isn't going to cut it. You will need to block the identity.

That's the short and sweet.

Mike Macgirvin 🖥️

Oh, and the did resolver algorithm we're going to be using with ActivityPub does not rely on proof of waste technology. It uses ed25519 keys and a lookup on participating servers at a .well-known endpoint. That's it.

Ariadne Conill 🐰:therian:

@JessTheUnstill @hrefna @jenniferplusplus this is why i’ve always proposed a form of encrypted key escrow instead. you store the key(s) on the server as an encrypted blob and then decrypt it on the device when you need it.

problem is, we can talk about steps to mitigate shitty admins who want to do performative power plays, but those same admins like the status quo because they benefit from the power imbalance and user lock-in. you won’t sell the empire builders on tools which make keeping the empire going more difficult.

this is why every time i get interested in this space again i conclude that we would basically have to start over from scratch to build a more fair social networking system.

Jenniferplusplus

@mikedev A very quick scan of the dashboard says that Fedidb is aware of at least 23,000 fediverse servers. The current location for a DID could be any of those. You're going to poll the entire fediverse to find where to send messages?

Jess👾

For a lot of admins/mods, the sense of power and control over others is the currency they require to do the work of maintaining their instances. A whole part of the draw for building and maintaining a community is to have the power over your little fiefdom.

@ariadne
@hrefna @jenniferplusplus

Jenniferplusplus

@JessTheUnstill
I try to extend a little more grace than that. I'm sure there's a contingent of admins who just wanted to provide a service for people, and they get pushed into this defensive and controlling stance by the lack of tools and support.

@ariadne @hrefna

Mike Macgirvin 🖥️

All Mastodon is going to see is a resolvable URL that returns an actor record. Just like they see today. The URL is probably going to look a bit strange -- but if you fetch it, it will behave like any fediverse actor id.

It will have some properties which might be of interest to you if you wish to support nomadic identity. If you don't, you may go about your life and have your entire online existence tied to a temporary rental name just like you do now.

Jenniferplusplus

@mikedev OK? Except I'm asking for someone to show me how to draw the rest of the owl. This kind of hand-wavy don't-worry-about-it response is extremely unhelpful.

Vasya Sovari

@jenniferplusplus is it bad that I have exactly zero clue what any of this means? If so, scale 1-10

Jenniferplusplus

@VasyaSovari No, I think it means you've made better life choices than I did

bumblefudge

@hrefna @JessTheUnstill @jenniferplusplus @ariadne i'm with hrefna here, the question "are dids dumb and why?" kinda misses the point-- DIDs are an interop layer for key management systems, and DID URLs are an immature extension of that (the WG never really shipped them). if you have good-faith questions about how DIDs work i was in that W3C WG and can explain as much or as little as is helpful, but this thread isn't really meeting my minimum threshold of good-faith as is...

Jenniferplusplus

@by_caballero
I'm not sure who this is directed at? Assuming it's me: I'm approaching the topic with the same level of bombast as I've seen from others. But sure, I'll pull it back.

Cryptographic keys are not an identity. They are a credential. In context of communication systems, identity is mostly the place where messages to you will be delivered. Making credentials portable does not untether you from that delivery address.

@hrefna @JessTheUnstill @ariadne

bumblefudge

@jenniferplusplus @hrefna @JessTheUnstill @ariadne that's a great argument against coupling AP actors to one permanent identifier (particularly to an identifier that maps 1:1 to a self-managed key), but it's not really a good argument against using DIDs or DID URLs? or even the use-cases that the nomadic identity people are targeting in the first place?

Jenniferplusplus

@by_caballero
In that case, the nomadic identity fans are not being clear

@hrefna @JessTheUnstill @ariadne

Ariadne Conill 🐰:therian:

@by_caballero @hrefna @JessTheUnstill @jenniferplusplus cool story, but the people who were pushing for this crap in that WG were largely crypto bros who wanted them for Web3 bullshit, so no, i think the question is quite valid in and of itself

bumblefudge

@ariadne @hrefna @JessTheUnstill @jenniferplusplus https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Good_faith

i was in that WG, even flew to the in-person meetings. i work in crypto. i am not a bro. you're failing miserably at engaging in good faith with someone who is engaging you as a peer with relevant expertise. please stop insulting me

bumblefudge

@jenniferplusplus @hrefna @JessTheUnstill @ariadne well, i certainly have my differences of strategy and would not have approached the developer community in the same way, but I think they're coming from a well-intended place and trying to convince the developer community to make a MAJOR change in the identity model of the fediverse stack. i like the general direction, even if i don't like the specific proposal and I encourage people to think through the usecases they're trying to enable...

Ariadne Conill 🐰:therian:

@by_caballero @hrefna @JessTheUnstill @jenniferplusplus

you work in a planet incinerating industry, which attaches itself to whatever buzzword it can find in order to sell pumped assets to pensioners who don’t know any better.

i design distributed systems for a living.

we are not the same.

bumblefudge

@jenniferplusplus @hrefna @JessTheUnstill @ariadne DIDs weren't actually invented to promote blockchains or impose one ring to rule them all. they were built to federate custodial, user-controlled, and user-managed key systems alike to enable portability and translation between very different identity systems. lots of projects miss the point and invent a DID method to power a closed system, which is just open-platform theatre. if step 1 is "use my did method" they've already missed the point...

bumblefudge

@jenniferplusplus @hrefna @JessTheUnstill @ariadne (that's not exactly what the zot people are doing, fwiw, nor is it what the bluesky people are doing, nor the "just use keyoxide for everything" people, tbc, but i don't think we're done until we have a solution that works for at least 2 of those 3 and lets very different kinds of software migrate users between them and federate across those differences)