@dalias this is a decent point about LLMs and AI but it’s going to be solved within the year from the research labs, then probably another 6 months rolled into the FOSS/commercial AI tools
-
@aud @dalias @paninid @hipsterelectron @Techronic9876 Indeed, and that's why "AI is replacing human jobs" is misleading. More like "AI is doing things that would break existing law if a human were to do the same things". This is obviously valuable because crime pays.
-
@jedbrown @aud @paninid @hipsterelectron @Techronic9876 Wow this is such a perfect explanation and ALSO explains why it's the exact same people behind it as cryptocurrency.
-
@[email protected] @[email protected] @[email protected] @[email protected] @[email protected] "you couldn't charge an NVIDIA GPU with a crime... not outside of Texas, anyway!"
-
@aud @paninid @hipsterelectron @jedbrown @Techronic9876 Please please please charge the nvidia gpus with a crime and apply civil forfeiture to them.
-
@[email protected] @[email protected] @[email protected] @[email protected] @[email protected]
computer says no,
think that's not a crime?
now the GPU's doing science
on the company's dime -
@[email protected] @[email protected] @[email protected] @[email protected] @[email protected] oh my god: having to donate compute time to the public good would be a lovely punishment for these tech fuckers.
-
Asta [AMP]replied to Asta [AMP] last edited by [email protected]
@[email protected] @[email protected] @[email protected] @[email protected] @[email protected] "Hope you enjoyed your crypto scam! You now have to donate 10% of your available computing resources to a set of public universities and/or create programs providing free compute to schools and other educational resources"
-
@[email protected] @[email protected] @[email protected] @[email protected] @[email protected] I wish there was a government position where I got to dole out ironic yet appropriate punishments for corporations because I would dedicate myself to that job 110%.
-
d@nny "disc@" mc²replied to Asta [AMP] last edited by
@aud @dalias @paninid @jedbrown @Techronic9876 a part of my brain tells me this means corps get to dictate priorities for that computing which makes it less of a public good than building independent public infrastructure. appropriate fines like in the billions commensurate to actual harm could be appropriated for something like this but i would prefer for the FTC to apply the banhammer
-
Cassandrichreplied to d@nny "disc@" mc² last edited by
@hipsterelectron @aud @paninid @jedbrown @Techronic9876 Oh I just wanted the gpus seized and destroyed (or even "destroyed" and given to pigs' gamer kids or whatever 🤪) not just made to donate % of compute time.
-
@[email protected] @[email protected] @[email protected] @[email protected] @[email protected] (I 100% agree on both points... actually, I suspect asset seizure would be something they could directly exploit; do crimes on (or claim the crimes were committed on) out of date hardware and bam, you've reaped the benefits of crime and don't have to worry about offloading old hardware).
-
@[email protected] @[email protected] @[email protected] @[email protected] @[email protected] I guess the reality is there's nothing a corporation can't exploit or abuse if they have the financial means to do so, so they need to not have the means. Tax and fine them into oblivion.
