Bluesky's solution to the dreaded "quote post" feature - allow user control over whether posts can be used in quote posts or not.
-
Bluesky's solution to the dreaded "quote post" feature - allow user control over whether posts can be used in quote posts or not.
Not bad
@mastodonmigration
-
@AkaSci @mastodonmigration I knew it could be done!
-
Seems like a good solution.
Few thoughts/questions:
1. Are you notified when someone quoteposts one of your posts you so that you can remove it if you don't want to be quoted?
2. Is there a way to lock a post such that it can not be quoteposted?
3. Is there a general way to say you don't want any of your posts to be quoteposted?
-
@mastodonmigration @AkaSci My impression, yes, yes (also after the fact), no
-
Mastodon Migrationreplied to Mastodon Migration last edited by
One more question...
4. If someone detaches their quotepost from one of your posts are you notified so you can either remove or edit the original post?
-
Hmmm, seems like #2 after the fact may not be good enough. This detach thing seems good, but if you can only remove your quoted post after it has been posted, then the situation exists where you are responsible for being constantly vigilant, and the damage can be done before you have a chance to take action to detach the post.
-
okanogen TheEnemyFromWithinreplied to AkaSci 🛰️ last edited by
@AkaSci @mastodonmigration
Oh no!
Being quoted obviously the worst thing in the world.
Mastodon needs to grow up about this. -
@mastodonmigration @AkaSci You misunderstood. It was shown in the original post already.
You have both options of detaching after the fact, banning quotes when composing a post. And even changing this setting on a post you already posted. (Like for replies)
And you get notified when someone quotes a post (where allowed). And you can look for all quotes of a post.
-
Mastodon Migrationreplied to okanogen TheEnemyFromWithin last edited by
It is a good thing to look at the Bluesky implementation and see what lessons can be learned. It seems like they are learning that unfettered quoteposts have abuse issues, and that is why they are doing this detach thing.
The question remains, if this is enough? Some sort of control by the original poster over whether their post can be quoted, BEFORE the post is quoteposted, seems kind of necessary.
Simply stated, users should be able to mark their posts as NOT QUOTABLE.
-
@mastodonmigration @AkaSci On Mastodon, if I reply to a post (without boosting that) and the original poster edits or removes that post, do I get notified?
-
Don't know.
-
@mastodonmigration @AkaSci The answer is no. I get edit notifications only if I boosted specifically (not only faved or replied). Despite the fact that an edit could make the reply unfitting the new context. There are no delete notifications for posts I interacted with at all, as far as I know.
-
@mastodonmigration @AkaSci (Related, if I reply and later edit my reply, the person mentioned only gets the original reply as notification, but not for the edit)
-
Got it. So long as you can turn off allowing your post to be quoteposted for any post, seems like a good solution. And, the additional ability to detach it after the fact is good. Would be nice to have a global, "never allow quoteposting of my posts."
-
Honestly not following all the cases you describe, but they do seem like things that could be abused. Introduction of editing certainly created the potential for all sorts of "completely changed the context of the post" kinds of issues. These were a subject of lots of conversation prior to getting editing of posts. However, have not seen rampant abuse of editing along these lines. And think most everyone likes editing and would not go back.
1/n
-
@mastodonmigration @AkaSci 3 would be a very (perhaps overly) Mastodon-y approach, and then basically everyone would set it to "no"
-
Mastodon Migrationreplied to Mastodon Migration last edited by
That is not to say these potential issues should not be addressed. Just that it is necessary to balance the benefits that introduction of new features can provide against the potential for abuse of those feature and somehow sort out what is and is not in practice going to be a problem.
-
@mastodonmigration @AkaSci Yeah that's ok. Mine was just an example in order to ask you not to do double standards against BS compared to here.
-
Actually doubt it. Would guess that most people would welcome having their post's being quoteposted, so long as they could monitor the situation and "detach" them from abusive posts.
Another topic of discussion would certainly be what is the default? Are your post's automatically quotable unless you turn it off, or do you need to turn it on?
-
Trying very hard not to have double standards. Think that we can learn a lot from Bluesky's experience with quoteposts and starter packs. Two capabilities that hold the promise to make Mastodon better if implemented with appropriate user safety and consent considerations.
This is an entirely separate conversation from the ownership of Bluesky and their as yet unrealized 'distributed' architecture, and the potential for user capture and marginalization.
