@SallyStrange @pteryx ok it could be the "literal" definition of censorship but reasonably if you ask most people they would not say that is censorship.

Sally Strange

Answer the question.

Hunterrules0_o

@SallyStrange @puppygirlhornypost2 @pteryx Just did. I said its a estimate

Sally Strange

So, you're just gonna lie on our faces. There was no reference to sex. There was a reference to vaginas. In your head, vaginas = sex.

As I said, you simply re-enacted the prudish censorious impulse that led bluesky to treat the Vagina Museum as if they were posting porn, and thought that would be funny. As I said, you are part of the problem the OP was pointing out.

@puppygirlhornypost2 @pteryx

Hunterrules0_o

@SallyStrange @puppygirlhornypost2 @pteryx your saying that for the entire muesuem. I mean fuck there has to be some? Its a muesuem. it cant be ALL just educational stuff. that wouldn't be that good of a archive of that sort of stuff then. which is what a muesuem is suppose to do.

^^^^ And if your gonna make the claim that on the subdomain that was posted there was no nsfw that does not apply because there likely is on the main domain

scrottie (he/him/they)

@Hunterrules0_o @SallyStrange @puppygirlhornypost2 @pteryx "Its a muesuem. it cant be ALL just educational stuff." This thread is amazing. Thank you to everyone who contributed to this... for better or worse. - someone who spent a heck of a lot of time at the campus Natural History Museum.

Hunterrules0_o

@scrottie @SallyStrange @puppygirlhornypost2 @pteryx I mean by educational non sex.

scrottie (he/him/they)

@Hunterrules0_o @SallyStrange @puppygirlhornypost2 @pteryx I hope all of this doesn't put you off of going to some museums, and seeing that they're not just collections of historic curios, and that porn/not porn is an absolutely abysmal, dark-age lens to look at the vast wealth of art, culture, technology, medicine, natural history, human history (cultural sexual labor divisions create fascinating functional spaces), etc, etc through, beside being completely fraught...

Hunterrules0_o

@scrottie @SallyStrange @puppygirlhornypost2 @pteryx im not saying your wrong. im just saying that most likely explains why it got that age restriction warning

Pteryx the Puzzle Secretary

@Hunterrules0_o @scrottie @SallyStrange @puppygirlhornypost2

I'm guessing that you're too technically ignorant to realize that word filters are incapable of interpreting context. Someone simply enters a list of words to react to and the computer reacts, no matter what. It's as though, like you, they jump to conclusions based on the presence of a particular word.

1/2

Pteryx the Puzzle Secretary

@Hunterrules0_o @scrottie @SallyStrange @puppygirlhornypost2

Back in the early 90s, before the actual Internet was open to the general public and when online services like AOL were popular, there was an infamous incident where AOL censored the word "breast", which shut down a message board that discussed breast cancer. (I'd imagine that it would have put a damper on discussing chicken recipes, too.)

Despite the hype about "AI", word filter tech has not improved since then.

2/2

Passenger

@scrottie @Hunterrules0_o @SallyStrange @puppygirlhornypost2 @pteryx

This is the best thread today.

What I love most about it, I think, is that this dude has evidently never been into an art museum. Do you know what you see in art museums? Boobs and vulvas. A whole lot of boobs and vulvas.

Last I checked, art museums weren't being classified as porn.

Amber

@[email protected] @[email protected] @[email protected] @[email protected] @[email protected] it’s almost as if people’s bodies aren’t just for sex! We actually use them…

Amber

@[email protected] @[email protected] @[email protected] @[email protected] gynecologists shaking their fists and storming out of the room because their profession isn't real, it relates to female genitalia and therefore pornography.