I try to not use my title too much but in response to Zuck's recent speech:

[kingu@mstdn.social]

@cwebber

You forgot to tag this dude along

@zuck

[cwebber@social.coop]

Ah right thank you @kingu

Ahem @zuck as co-author/co-editor of the W3C ActivityPub specification you are officially exiled from our land

You are not welcome on the Fediverse

Opening the door to racism and transphobia to kneel at the throne of Donald Trump is unforgiveable

Get out of here, go, and do not return

[cwebber@social.coop]

Meta, 5 years ago: "Boo hoo you gotta let us control all the social medias you couldn't trust anyone else to do it. Please regulate us, please make regulations that literally only we could comply with"

Meta 2 years ago: "Oh we're gonna join the fediverse"

Meta today: "We're 4chan now. We can't let Elon Musk have all the 4chan fun"

Get them outta here GET THEM OUT

[moira@mastodon.murkworks.net]

@cwebber …what’d I miss? What speech?

[cwebber@social.coop]

@moira https://social.coop/@cwebber/113788266953239523

[django@kowelenz.social]

@moira
See https://social.coop/@cwebber/113788266953239523
@cwebber

[cwebber@social.coop]

Here's more info on Zuck's speech in case you need it https://social.coop/@cwebber/113788266953239523 #contextpatrol

[moira@mastodon.murkworks.net]

@django @cwebber yeah sorry, I replied too quickly, I found it

[cwebber@social.coop]

@moira @django no worries, it did prompt me to add a link to the thread of replies, good call

[fedipact@cyberpunk.lol]

@cwebber way ahead of ya

[wim_v12e@scholar.social]

@cwebber @kingu "begone, foul dwimmerlaik"

[davey_cakes@mastodon.ie]

@cwebber it has always been time for an Isolate Threads campaign.

Or do you mean airgapping the company physically and not just a #fedipact kind of thing

[cwebber@social.coop]

@davey_cakes mainly I just wanted to indicate that by explicitly saying that transpobia and racism is now allowed, #fedipact is now the same level of concern that Isolate Gab was

[slink@tilde.zone]

@cwebber forgive me for being an idiot, but it seems like this is a small step in the right direction?
From what I’ve seen, the *current* Meta stance is to allow alt-right views and shadowban left-leaning accounts. The other thing he mentioned was removal of foreign intelligence bots, which from what I’ve seen mainly target antifascist posts (yuumei art’s protest pieces come to mind).
Is there anything I’m missing?

[cwebber@social.coop]

@slink Did you actually watch the same video where he said that the election of Trump is an indicator that it's time to prioritize allowing more right-leaning speech and that they're going to remove restrictions on transphobic and racist content?

Because that's the video *I* watched. Which one did you watch? https://www.facebook.com/zuck/videos/1525382954801931/

[linux_is_best@misskey.de]

@[email protected] @[email protected]

I am not looking forward to the shit storm I may stuble in on when I clock back into work January 9th.

[thzinc@hachyderm.io]

@cwebber this looks like preemptive compliance with Project 2025, section 28 on FCC: https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/24088042-project-2025s-mandate-for-leadership-the-conservative-promise/

In particular, the move to TX looks like a reason to cozy up to TX HB 20 (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Texas_House_Bill_20), as suggested on p849.

[suetanvil@freeradical.zone]

@wim_v12e @cwebber @kingu

"Zuck off" is right there!

[foolishowl@social.coop]

@cwebber @davey_cakes social.coop should re-evaluate its policy.

[zetabeta@mastodon.social]

@cwebber
reminder:
meta inc owns whatsapp.

do you use whatsapp ?!